Skip to content
Compare Hearts vs Rangers

Hearts vs Rangers Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Hearts vs Rangers: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Hearts Hearts Home Team
Rangers Rangers Away Team
Hearts
46.1
D W D W L L L W L W

Last 10 Matches

Rangers
55.4
W W D L L D D W W L

Performance Radar

Hearts
Rangers

Categories Won

3

Hearts

5

Draw

7

Rangers

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 2D, 4L

40%

4W, 3D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.0

20 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-2

-2

+6

+6

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
C. Miller (3 goals)
Youssef Chermiti (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 14
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
50%

3W / 6 matches

43%

3W / 7 matches

Away Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

33%

1W / 3 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
52.8

League Difficulty: 71.7, Opponent Quality: 69.0

56.3

League Difficulty: 66.3, Opponent Quality: 61.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 6 matches

33%

1W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.15

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.35

1.69

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.11

Adjusted Power Rating
46.1

Attack: 61.7, Defense: 34.3, Form: 41.1

55.4

Attack: 63.8, Defense: 63.8, Form: 42.5

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

4
1

16-30'

3
1

31-45'

1
3

46-60'

5
3

61-75'

1
5

76-90+'

2
Hearts
Rangers
Hearts

Power Rating Breakdown

46.1

Overall

Attack 61.7
Defense 34.3
Form 41.1
Consistency 44.8
Rangers

Power Rating Breakdown

55.4

Overall

Attack 63.8
Defense 63.8
Form 42.5
Consistency 50.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

71.7 vs 66.3

Opponent Quality

69.0 vs 61.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 33%
Hearts logo Hearts
D
Rapid Vienna (85%)
W
Inverness (52%)
D
Benfica (82%)
W
Dundee Utd (50%)
L
Benfica (87%)
L
Aberdeen (72%)
L
Sturm (78%)
W
Raith Rovers (58%)
Rangers logo Rangers
W
Jablonec (74%)
W
St. Mirren (57%)
D
Jagiellonia (78%)
L
Hibernian (61%)
L
Jagiellonia (83%)
D
Dundee Utd (55%)
D
West Ham (49%)
W
Saint-Étienne (42%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Rapid Vienna H
2 - 2 D
85%
Inverness H
6 - 2 W
52%
Benfica H
1 - 1 D
82%
Dundee Utd H
4 - 0 W
50%
Benfica A
1 - 6 L
87%
Aberdeen A
1 - 2 L
72%
Sturm H
0 - 2 L
78%
Raith Rovers A
1 - 0 W
58%
Sturm A
0 - 4 L
83%
Rayo H
2 - 1 W
43%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Jablonec H
1 - 0 W
74%
St. Mirren H
5 - 1 W
57%
Jagiellonia H
1 - 1 D
78%
Hibernian H
1 - 2 L
61%
Jagiellonia A
1 - 2 L
83%
Dundee Utd A
1 - 1 D
55%
West Ham H
0 - 0 D
49%
Saint-Étienne H
2 - 1 W
42%
Falkirk A
5 - 2 W
56%
Hibernian H
1 - 2 L
61%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 52.8 vs 56.3), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

The attacking output of Hearts and Rangers is virtually identical, with both sides posting averages of 1.8 and 1.8 goals per game respectively.

Defensively, Rangers is far superior, conceding just 1.2 goals per match with 2 clean sheets, while Hearts leaks 2.0 goals per match.

Hearts has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 6 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Rangers has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Statistical modeling projects 3.4 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

📈 Form Momentum: Rangers has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

💡 Why This Matters: The 9.3-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 73% win probability for Rangers. In practical terms, Rangers would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

Rangers has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 9.3-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Hearts

Hearts

VS
Rangers

Rangers

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Hearts

4W 2D 4L · 18 goals scored · 20 conceded

Rangers

4W 3D 3L · 18 goals scored · 12 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or