Hereford vs Radcliffe Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Hereford vs Radcliffe: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Hereford
Home Team
Radcliffe
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Hereford
Draw
Radcliffe
Statistical Comparison
4W, 2D, 4L
1W, 3D, 6L
15 / 10 matches
11 / 10 matches
15 / 10 matches
23 / 10 matches
0
-12
2 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
3W / 7 matches
1W / 6 matches
1W / 3 matches
0W / 4 matches
League Difficulty: 31.5, Opponent Quality: 41.5
League Difficulty: 33.0, Opponent Quality: 43.3
0W / 1 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.5 | Diff: +0.29
Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.37
Attack: 38.6, Defense: 38.6, Form: 30.8
Attack: 32.7, Defense: 20.8, Form: 8.9
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Hereford
Radcliffe
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.
Radcliffe has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 39.2) compared to Hereford (SoS: 27.1). This means Radcliffe's statistics carry more weight - they've been battle-tested against quality opponents.
Hereford holds the attacking edge with 1.5 goals per match versus Radcliffe's 1.1, though the gap isn't insurmountable.
Hereford's backline outperforms Radcliffe's, with 1.5 goals conceded per match versus 2.3.
Radcliffe has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Statistical modeling projects 3.2 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.
❄️ Form Momentum: Radcliffe is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Hereford is on the rise with 4W in last 10, while Radcliffe shows signs of decline with 1W in last 10.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Hereford faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.5 goals per match. If Radcliffe can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 8.3-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 71% win probability for Hereford. In practical terms, Hereford would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.
While Hereford holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 8.3-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.
In their recent National League N / S match (2026-04-18), Hereford prevailed 3-1 against Radcliffe. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Hereford secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. Radcliffe will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Hereford will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Hereford
Radcliffe
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Hereford
4W 2D 4L · 15 goals scored · 15 conceded
Radcliffe
1W 3D 6L · 11 goals scored · 23 conceded
Popular Teams