Skip to content
Compare HJK vs ZW

HJK vs ZW Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare HJK vs ZW: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

HJK HJK Home Team
ZW ZW Away Team
HJK
48.2
L W D W W L D L W D

Last 10 Matches

ZW
59.7
W W W W W D W L L L

Performance Radar

HJK
ZW

Categories Won

2

HJK

5

Draw

8

ZW

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 3D, 3L

60%

6W, 1D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+3

+3

+6

+6

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Borchers (6 goals)
J. Opoku (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 11
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 11
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
45.6

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 46.0

54.6

League Difficulty: 62.4, Opponent Quality: 49.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.61

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.19

1.84

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.14

Adjusted Power Rating
48.2

Attack: 57.4, Defense: 47.8, Form: 38.2

59.7

Attack: 59.3, Defense: 66.2, Form: 62.8

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1
3

16-30'

2
3

31-45'

2
2

46-60'

4
4

61-75'

5
5

76-90+'

3
HJK
ZW
HJK

Power Rating Breakdown

48.2

Overall

Attack 57.4
Defense 47.8
Form 38.2
Consistency 50.5
ZW

Power Rating Breakdown

59.7

Overall

Attack 59.3
Defense 66.2
Form 62.8
Consistency 43.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 62.4

Opponent Quality

46.0 vs 49.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
HJK logo HJK
L
KuPS (62%)
W
Mariehamn (27%)
D
Inter Turku (56%)
W
Jaro (34%)
W
Mariehamn (22%)
L
VPS (63%)
D
Ilves (46%)
L
TPS (46%)
ZW logo ZW
W
Dender (32%)
W
Cercle Brugge (51%)
W
La Louvière (38%)
W
La Louvière (42%)
W
Dender (49%)
D
Cercle Brugge (58%)
W
Charleroi (63%)
L
Gent (51%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
KuPS H
0 - 4 L
62%
Mariehamn A
4 - 0 W
27%
Inter Turku H
3 - 3 D
56%
Jaro A
5 - 2 W
34%
Mariehamn H
1 - 0 W
22%
VPS A
1 - 2 L
63%
Ilves H
2 - 2 D
46%
TPS A
0 - 1 L
46%
Lahti H
1 - 0 W
43%
Inter Turku A
1 - 1 D
61%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dender H
2 - 1 W
32%
Cercle Brugge A
3 - 2 W
51%
La Louvière H
4 - 0 W
38%
La Louvière A
2 - 0 W
42%
Dender A
2 - 1 W
49%
Cercle Brugge H
2 - 2 D
58%
Charleroi H
1 - 0 W
63%
Gent A
0 - 2 L
51%
Standard H
0 - 1 L
64%
Mechelen A
1 - 2 L
46%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 45.6 vs 54.6), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with HJK averaging 1.8 and ZW averaging 1.7 goals per match.

ZW has the defensive edge, conceding 1.1 per match compared to HJK's 1.5.

HJK has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

ZW has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

ZW is a strong road team with a 60% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

ZW has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 11.5 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

HJK

HJK

VS
ZW

ZW

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

HJK

4W 3D 3L · 18 goals scored · 15 conceded

ZW

6W 1D 3L · 17 goals scored · 11 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or