Skip to content
Compare Horsham vs Bath

Horsham vs Bath Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Horsham vs Bath: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Horsham Horsham Home Team
Bath Bath Away Team
Horsham
36.7
L W W L L D L W L L

Last 10 Matches

Bath
36.1
D L L W L W L W L D

Performance Radar

Horsham
Bath

Categories Won

5

Horsham

3

Draw

7

Bath

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 1D, 6L

30%

3W, 2D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

2.2

22 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-3

-3

-6

-6

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

90%

9 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
20%

2 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
L. Gravata (2 goals)
S. Wilson (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
75%

3W / 4 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 6 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
39.8

League Difficulty: 33.0, Opponent Quality: 44.3

40.6

League Difficulty: 33.0, Opponent Quality: 45.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.92

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.08

1.4

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.2

Adjusted Power Rating
36.7

Attack: 29.9, Defense: 50.9, Form: 26.9

36.1

Attack: 48.3, Defense: 24.2, Form: 27.2

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

3
1

16-30'

3
1

31-45'

2
1

46-60'

2
1

61-75'

1
3

76-90+'

3
Horsham
Bath
Horsham

Power Rating Breakdown

36.7

Overall

Attack 29.9
Defense 50.9
Form 26.9
Consistency 46.0
Bath

Power Rating Breakdown

36.1

Overall

Attack 48.3
Defense 24.2
Form 27.2
Consistency 49.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

33.0 vs 33.0

Opponent Quality

44.3 vs 45.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Horsham logo Horsham
L
Sutton (41%)
W
Eastbourne T. (42%)
W
Chippenham (38%)
L
Salisbury (46%)
L
Weston-s-Mare (40%)
D
Maidstone (57%)
L
Farnborough (48%)
W
Dorking (34%)
Bath logo Bath
D
Newport (45%)
L
Plymouth (62%)
L
Maidstone (57%)
W
Dorking (39%)
L
Totton (43%)
W
Chesham (43%)
L
Torquay (53%)
W
Chippenham (38%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Sutton A
0 - 2 L
41%
Eastbourne T. H
3 - 0 W
42%
Chippenham H
3 - 2 W
38%
Salisbury A
1 - 2 L
46%
Weston-s-Mare A
0 - 1 L
40%
Maidstone H
0 - 0 D
57%
Farnborough A
0 - 2 L
48%
Dorking H
3 - 0 W
34%
Torquay A
0 - 2 L
53%
Hampton & RB A
0 - 2 L
44%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Newport H
2 - 2 D
45%
Plymouth H
0 - 3 L
62%
Maidstone H
2 - 3 L
57%
Dorking A
3 - 1 W
39%
Totton A
1 - 2 L
43%
Chesham H
4 - 2 W
43%
Torquay A
1 - 4 L
53%
Chippenham H
1 - 0 W
38%
Maidenhead A
0 - 3 L
48%
Eastbourne A
2 - 2 D
29%

AI Analysis

On paper, these teams are closely aligned, and the data backs that up. Raw statistics can be misleading without context, but strength-of-opponent adjustments reinforce just how competitive this matchup is. Neither side has padded their numbers against weak opposition.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 39.8 vs 40.6), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

Bath holds the attacking edge with 1.6 goals per match versus Horsham's 1.0, though the gap isn't insurmountable.

Horsham holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 1.3 goals per game and recording 3 clean sheets, compared to Bath's leaky backline that surrenders 2.2 goals per match.

Horsham has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Bath has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Horsham has an exceptional home record with a 75% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.0 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking possible given current form.

⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.

💡 Why This Matters: Bath's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

Statistically, there is very little to choose between these two teams. The numbers point to an evenly contested match where fine details and in-game decisions will likely prove decisive.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Horsham

Horsham

VS
Bath

Bath

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Horsham

3W 1D 6L · 10 goals scored · 13 conceded

Bath

3W 2D 5L · 16 goals scored · 22 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or