Skip to content
Compare Ilves vs Differdange

Ilves vs Differdange Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Ilves vs Differdange: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Ilves Ilves Home Team
Differdange Differdange Away Team
Ilves
45.6
L L D W L L W W L W

Last 10 Matches

Differdange
34.4
L D

Performance Radar

Ilves
Differdange

Categories Won

10

Ilves

1

Draw

4

Differdange

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 1D, 5L

0%

0W, 1D, 1L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

0.5

1 / 2 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.5

3 / 2 matches

Goal Difference
+1

+1

-2

-2

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

50%

1 / 2 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
30%

3 / 10 matches

50%

1 / 2 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

50%

1 / 2 matches

Top Scorer
T. Hytönen (4 goals)
S. Thill (1 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 4
1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 0
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
49.9

League Difficulty: 58.2, Opponent Quality: 58.1

67.5

League Difficulty: 78.0, Opponent Quality: 60.5

Elite Opponent Record
25%

1W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.88

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.22

0.7

Actual: 0.5 | Diff: -0.2

Adjusted Power Rating
45.6

Attack: 36.6, Defense: 66.6, Form: 40.0

34.4

Attack: 19.6, Defense: 58.8, Form: 0.0

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1

16-30'

4

31-45'

1
2

46-60'

2

61-75'

1

76-90+'

Ilves
Differdange
Ilves

Power Rating Breakdown

45.6

Overall

Attack 36.6
Defense 66.6
Form 40.0
Consistency 39.7
Differdange

Power Rating Breakdown

34.4

Overall

Attack 19.6
Defense 58.8
Form 0.0
Consistency 92.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

58.2 vs 78.0

Opponent Quality

58.1 vs 60.5

Elite Opponent Record

25% vs 0%
Ilves logo Ilves
L
VPS (50%)
L
Gnistan (58%)
D
Rijeka (70%)
W
Mariehamn (29%)
L
Rijeka (75%)
L
Oulu (43%)
W
Stjarnan (73%)
W
Lahti (54%)
Differdange logo Differdange
L
Ilves (63%)
D
Ilves (58%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
VPS H
0 - 1 L
50%
Gnistan A
2 - 3 L
58%
Rijeka H
1 - 1 D
70%
Mariehamn H
2 - 0 W
29%
Rijeka A
0 - 1 L
75%
Oulu A
0 - 1 L
43%
Stjarnan H
2 - 1 W
73%
Lahti H
1 - 0 W
54%
Stjarnan A
0 - 1 L
75%
TPS A
3 - 1 W
54%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Ilves A
1 - 3 L
63%
Ilves H
0 - 0 D
58%

AI Analysis

While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.

Context matters here: Differdange's schedule strength (SoS: 67.5) has been notably more demanding than Ilves's (SoS: 49.9), meaning their underlying stats reflect performance against higher-calibre opposition and should be weighted accordingly.

Ilves leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.1 goals per game compared to Differdange's 0.5 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

Ilves has the defensive edge, conceding 1.0 per match compared to Differdange's 1.5.

Ilves has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Differdange has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Statistical modeling projects 2.0 goals in this fixture. The data points Under 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at possible based on both sides' scoring records.

❄️ Form Momentum: Differdange is struggling for form, winning just 0 of their last 2 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Ilves is on the rise with 4W in last 10, while Differdange shows signs of decline with 0W in last 2.

💡 Why This Matters: The 11.2-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 78% win probability for Ilves. In practical terms, Ilves would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

While Ilves holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 11.2-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.

These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. In their recent UEFA Conference League encounter (2026-07-16), Ilves came out on top with a 3-1 victory over Differdange. European competition results carry significant weight in assessing the balance of power between these sides. Ilves secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. Differdange will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Ilves will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost. These two teams drew 0-0 in the UEFA Conference League (2026-07-08). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Ilves

Ilves

VS
Differdange

Differdange

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Ilves

4W 1D 5L · 11 goals scored · 10 conceded

Differdange

0W 1D 1L · 1 goals scored · 3 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or