Ilves vs Differdange Estadísticas Cara a Cara y Comparación de Forma
Compara Ilves vs Differdange: estadísticas cara a cara, forma reciente, goles, récord defensivo e indicadores de fuerza de los últimos partidos.
Ilves
Equipo Local
Comparar...
Radar de Rendimiento
Categorías Ganadas
Ilves
Empate
Differdange
Comparación Estadística
4V, 1E, 5D
0V, 1E, 1D
11 / 10 partidos
1 / 2 partidos
10 / 10 partidos
3 / 2 partidos
+1
-2
2 / 10 partidos
1 / 2 partidos
3 / 10 partidos
1 / 2 partidos
4 / 10 partidos
1 / 2 partidos
3V / 5 partidos
0V / 1 partidos
1V / 5 partidos
0V / 1 partidos
Dificultad de Liga: 58.2, Calidad del Rival: 58.1
Dificultad de Liga: 78.0, Calidad del Rival: 60.5
1V / 4 partidos
0V / 0 partidos
Real: 1.1 | Dif: +0.22
Real: 0.5 | Dif: -0.2
Ataque: 36.6, Defensa: 66.6, Forma: 40.0
Ataque: 19.6, Defensa: 58.8, Forma: 0.0
Análisis de Tiempos de Gol
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Desglose de Poder
General
Desglose de Poder
General
Dificultad del Calendario
Mide la dificultad de los rivales enfrentados. Mayor = calendario más difícil.
Dificultad de Liga
Calidad del Rival
Récord contra Élite
Ilves
Calidad del Rival: La calidad combina la fuerza de la liga, la forma reciente por puntos, la diferencia de goles y el contexto local/visitante. No es solo tamaño o reputación del club.
Análisis IA
While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.
Context matters here: Differdange's schedule strength (SoS: 67.5) has been notably more demanding than Ilves's (SoS: 49.9), meaning their underlying stats reflect performance against higher-calibre opposition and should be weighted accordingly.
Ilves leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.1 goals per game compared to Differdange's 0.5 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.
Ilves has the defensive edge, conceding 1.0 per match compared to Differdange's 1.5.
Ilves has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Differdange has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Statistical modeling projects 2.0 goals in this fixture. The data points Under 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at possible based on both sides' scoring records.
❄️ Form Momentum: Differdange is struggling for form, winning just 0 of their last 2 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Ilves is on the rise with 4W in last 10, while Differdange shows signs of decline with 0W in last 2.
💡 Why This Matters: The 11.2-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 78% win probability for Ilves. In practical terms, Ilves would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
While Ilves holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 11.2-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.
These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. In their recent UEFA Conference League encounter (2026-07-16), Ilves came out on top with a 3-1 victory over Differdange. European competition results carry significant weight in assessing the balance of power between these sides. Ilves secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. Differdange will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Ilves will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost. These two teams drew 0-0 in the UEFA Conference League (2026-07-08). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.
Simulador de Partido
Simulación de partido con IA basada en estadísticas reales
Ilves
Differdange
En los enfrentamientos H2H (duelos directos), para eliminar las fluctuaciones momentáneas y las casualidades, limitamos nuestros análisis a una profundidad óptima de exactamente 10 partidos. Ni más, ni menos. Este enfoque preciso es nuestro estándar de oro indiscutible, que revela en su forma más pura la superioridad táctica y psicológica que un equipo impone sobre otro. No nos dejamos llevar por el ruido del pasado, sino que nos enfocamos en la precisión milimétrica de la forma actual.
Resumen comparativo
Esta comparación de enfrentamientos directos analiza los últimos 10 partidos de cada equipo, evaluando la potencia ofensiva, la solidez defensiva, la consistencia en la forma y las métricas generales de rendimiento. Las valoraciones de potencia se calculan mediante un algoritmo ponderado que considera los goles marcados, los goles en contra, la tasa de victorias y las tendencias recientes de forma.
Ilves
4W 1D 5L · 11 goles marcados · 10 goles en contra
Differdange
0W 1D 1L · 1 goles marcados · 3 goles en contra
Equipos Populares