Skip to content
Compare FK IMT vs TSC

FK IMT vs TSC Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare FK IMT vs TSC: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

FK IMT FK IMT Home Team
TSC TSC Away Team
FK IMT
66.2
W W D W D D W W D W

Last 10 Matches

TSC
48.3
L D L W D L W W L W

Performance Radar

FK IMT
TSC

Categories Won

7

FK IMT

3

Draw

5

TSC

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
60%

6W, 4D, 0L

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

2.3

23 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.3

3 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+11

+11

+7

+7

Clean Sheet
70%

7 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
20%

2 / 10 matches

90%

9 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
30%

3 / 10 matches

100%

10 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
C. Keïta (3 goals)
A. Todoroski (6 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 11 / 2nd Half: 12
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
80%

4W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
51.8

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 49.6

39.1

League Difficulty: 54.0, Opponent Quality: 50.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.4

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: 0.0

2.19

Actual: 2.3 | Diff: +0.11

Adjusted Power Rating
66.2

Attack: 47.5, Defense: 91.6, Form: 61.1

48.3

Attack: 68.3, Defense: 41.6, Form: 35.6

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

5

16-30'

3
3

31-45'

2
3

46-60'

4
2

61-75'

3
4

76-90+'

5
FK IMT
TSC
FK IMT

Power Rating Breakdown

66.2

Overall

Attack 47.5
Defense 91.6
Form 61.1
Consistency 71.2
TSC

Power Rating Breakdown

48.3

Overall

Attack 68.3
Defense 41.6
Form 35.6
Consistency 44.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 54.0

Opponent Quality

49.6 vs 50.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
FK IMT logo FK IMT
W
Zemun (50%)
W
Čukarički (51%)
D
TSC (53%)
W
Spartak (28%)
D
Radnički Krag (52%)
D
Javor (52%)
W
Radnički Niš (51%)
W
Napredak (41%)
TSC logo TSC
L
H Ramat Gan (45%)
D
FK IMT (71%)
L
Radnički Niš (51%)
W
Javor (46%)
D
Radnički Krag (57%)
L
Mladost Lučani (60%)
W
Spartak (28%)
W
Napredak (36%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Zemun H
4 - 0 W
50%
Čukarički A
1 - 0 W
51%
TSC H
1 - 1 D
53%
Spartak A
1 - 0 W
28%
Radnički Krag H
0 - 0 D
52%
Javor A
0 - 0 D
52%
Radnički Niš H
2 - 0 W
51%
Napredak A
1 - 0 W
41%
Mladost Lučani H
1 - 1 D
60%
TSC A
3 - 1 W
58%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
H Ramat Gan A
1 - 2 L
45%
FK IMT A
1 - 1 D
71%
Radnički Niš H
1 - 2 L
51%
Javor H
6 - 1 W
46%
Radnički Krag A
2 - 2 D
57%
Mladost Lučani H
1 - 2 L
60%
Spartak A
4 - 1 W
28%
Napredak H
4 - 1 W
36%
FK IMT H
1 - 3 L
66%
Napredak A
2 - 1 W
41%

AI Analysis

Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.

Context matters here: FK IMT's schedule strength (SoS: 51.8) has been notably more demanding than TSC's (SoS: 39.1), meaning their underlying stats reflect performance against higher-calibre opposition and should be weighted accordingly.

TSC leads the attacking statistics, averaging 2.3 goals per game compared to FK IMT's 1.4 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

Defensively, FK IMT is far superior, conceding just 0.3 goals per match with 7 clean sheets, while TSC leaks 1.6 goals per match.

FK IMT has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

FK IMT is a strong road performer with a 80% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.8 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.

📈 Form Momentum: FK IMT has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 2.2 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

💡 Why This Matters: The 17.9-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for FK IMT. In practical terms, FK IMT would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

FK IMT emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (66.2 vs 48.3) and advantages in key areas, they should have enough to prevail.

These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. These two teams drew 1-1 in the Serbian Super Liga (2026-05-24). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning. In the Serbian Super Liga (2026-04-08), FK IMT beat TSC 1-3. League results are the most consistent indicator of form, and this result speaks volumes about the current dynamic between these teams. Notably, FK IMT achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against TSC shows genuine quality and mental strength. TSC will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. FK IMT will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

FK IMT

FK IMT

VS
TSC

TSC

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

FK IMT

6W 4D 0L · 14 goals scored · 3 conceded

TSC

4W 2D 4L · 23 goals scored · 16 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or