Inverness vs QOTS Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Inverness vs QOTS: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Inverness
Home Team
QOTS
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Inverness
Draw
QOTS
Statistical Comparison
6W, 3D, 1L
3W, 5D, 2L
13 / 10 matches
18 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
15 / 10 matches
+5
+3
5 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
3W / 4 matches
1W / 5 matches
3W / 6 matches
2W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 40.0, Opponent Quality: 49.4
League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 47.4
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.08
Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.14
Attack: 41.4, Defense: 70.1, Form: 57.4
Attack: 57.8, Defense: 48.2, Form: 28.9
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Inverness
QOTS
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.
Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 45.6 vs 46.4), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.
QOTS holds the attacking edge with 1.8 goals per match versus Inverness's 1.3, though the gap isn't insurmountable.
Inverness has the defensive edge, conceding 0.8 per match compared to QOTS's 1.5.
Inverness has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
QOTS has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Inverness has an exceptional home record with a 75% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.7 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.
📈 Form Momentum: Inverness has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 2.1 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Inverness is on the rise with 6W in last 10, while QOTS shows signs of decline with 3W in last 10.
💡 Why This Matters: The 8.9-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 72% win probability for Inverness. In practical terms, Inverness would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.
The numbers lean toward Inverness, with a 8.9-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
Inverness
QOTS
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Inverness
6W 3D 1L · 13 goals scored · 8 conceded
QOTS
3W 5D 2L · 18 goals scored · 15 conceded
Popular Teams