Skip to content
Compare Italy vs Japan

Italy vs Japan Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Italy vs Japan: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Italy Italy Home Team
Japan Japan Away Team
Italy
42.4
D W D W D L L L L D

Last 10 Matches

Japan
79.3
L W L W L W W W W W

Performance Radar

Italy
Japan

Categories Won

1

Italy

1

Draw

13

Japan

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 4D, 4L

70%

7W, 0D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

3.4

34 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

0.7

7 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+2

+2

+27

+27

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Piemonte (2 goals)
R. Ueki (7 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 15 / 2nd Half: 19
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

80%

4W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
44.2

League Difficulty: 59.0, Opponent Quality: 58.8

56.5

League Difficulty: 62.5, Opponent Quality: 61.5

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 4 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.23

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.07

3.0

Actual: 3.4 | Diff: +0.4

Adjusted Power Rating
42.4

Attack: 40.8, Defense: 59.7, Form: 18.8

79.3

Attack: 100, Defense: 81.7, Form: 74.5

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

4
2

16-30'

7
4

31-45'

2
1

46-60'

8
2

61-75'

8
4

76-90+'

5
Italy
Japan
Italy

Power Rating Breakdown

42.4

Overall

Attack 40.8
Defense 59.7
Form 18.8
Consistency 64.0
Japan

Power Rating Breakdown

79.3

Overall

Attack 100
Defense 81.7
Form 74.5
Consistency 43.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

59.0 vs 62.5

Opponent Quality

58.8 vs 61.5

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 40%
Italy logo Italy
D
Sweden (42%)
W
Serbia (33%)
D
Denmark (64%)
W
Serbia (38%)
D
Denmark (59%)
L
Sweden (38%)
L
United States (84%)
L
United States (84%)
Japan logo Japan
L
South Africa (76%)
W
South Africa (76%)
L
United States (84%)
W
United States (84%)
L
United States (84%)
W
Australia (61%)
W
South Korea (48%)
W
Philippines (38%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Sweden A
2 - 2 D
42%
Serbia H
3 - 0 W
33%
Denmark A
0 - 0 D
64%
Serbia A
6 - 0 W
38%
Denmark H
1 - 1 D
59%
Sweden H
0 - 1 L
38%
United States A
0 - 2 L
84%
United States A
0 - 3 L
84%
Brazil H
0 - 1 L
70%
Japan H
1 - 1 D
76%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
South Africa H
0 - 1 L
76%
South Africa H
5 - 0 W
76%
United States A
0 - 3 L
84%
United States A
1 - 0 W
84%
United States A
1 - 2 L
84%
Australia H
1 - 0 W
61%
South Korea A
4 - 1 W
48%
Philippines H
7 - 0 W
38%
Vietnam H
4 - 0 W
33%
India A
11 - 0 W
31%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule adjustment reveals a significant quality gap. The favorite has been tested against tougher opposition and has consistently delivered.

Context matters here: Japan's schedule strength (SoS: 56.5) has been notably more demanding than Italy's (SoS: 44.2), meaning their underlying stats reflect performance against higher-calibre opposition and should be weighted accordingly.

Japan's attack is on another level, averaging 3.4 goals per match with R. Ueki leading the charge (7 goals). This firepower makes them dangerous in any fixture.

Japan's backline outperforms Italy's, with 0.7 goals conceded per match versus 1.1.

Italy has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Japan has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 2 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Japan has an exceptional home record with a 80% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.

Japan is a strong road performer with a 60% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.3 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking unlikely given current form.

❄️ Form Momentum: Italy is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

🔥 Form Momentum: Japan is in scorching form, winning 7 of their last 10 matches with 34 goals scored. This level of consistency is difficult to sustain but devastating while it lasts.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Japan is on the rise with 7W in last 10, while Italy shows signs of decline with 2W in last 10.

💡 Why This Matters: The 36.9-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Japan. In practical terms, Japan would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Our opponent-adjusted metrics point overwhelmingly in one direction: Japan holds a commanding advantage here. The power rating gap — 79.3 against 42.4 — reinforces what the underlying numbers already suggest, making Japan a strong and justified favorite to win decisively.

These two teams drew 1-1 in the Internationals Women (2025-10-24). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Italy

Italy

VS
Japan

Japan

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Italy

2W 4D 4L · 13 goals scored · 11 conceded

Japan

7W 0D 3L · 34 goals scored · 7 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or