Kelty Hearts vs QOTS Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Kelty Hearts vs QOTS: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Kelty Hearts
Home Team
QOTS
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Kelty Hearts
Draw
QOTS
Statistical Comparison
4W, 2D, 4L
3W, 5D, 2L
12 / 10 matches
18 / 10 matches
14 / 10 matches
15 / 10 matches
-2
+3
1 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
2W / 5 matches
1W / 5 matches
2W / 5 matches
2W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 39.0, Opponent Quality: 47.8
League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 47.4
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.17
Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.14
Attack: 37.7, Defense: 50.3, Form: 37.7
Attack: 57.8, Defense: 48.2, Form: 28.9
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Kelty Hearts
QOTS
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.
With comparable strength of schedule figures (44.3 vs 46.4), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.
QOTS leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.8 goals per game compared to Kelty Hearts's 1.2 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.
The defensive records are closely aligned, with Kelty Hearts giving up 1.4 and QOTS giving up 1.5 per fixture.
Kelty Hearts has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
QOTS has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, QOTS faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.5 goals per match. If Kelty Hearts can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 5.6-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 64% win probability for QOTS. In practical terms, QOTS would win 6 out of 10 such matchups.
The numbers lean toward QOTS, with a 5.6-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.
These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. In the Scottish League Cup (2026-07-11), Kelty Hearts eliminated QOTS with a 1-1 result. Cup matches bring a unique intensity, and Kelty Hearts showed they can handle the pressure. Notably, Kelty Hearts achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against QOTS shows genuine quality and mental strength. QOTS will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Kelty Hearts will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost. These two teams drew 1-1 in the Scottish League One (2026-04-04). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Kelty Hearts
QOTS
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Kelty Hearts
4W 2D 4L · 12 goals scored · 14 conceded
QOTS
3W 5D 2L · 18 goals scored · 15 conceded
Popular Teams