KFUM vs Kristiansund Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare KFUM vs Kristiansund: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
KFUM
Home Team
Kristiansund
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
KFUM
Draw
Kristiansund
Statistical Comparison
3W, 2D, 5L
2W, 1D, 7L
10 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
14 / 10 matches
16 / 10 matches
-4
-8
3 / 10 matches
1 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
2W / 7 matches
1W / 4 matches
1W / 3 matches
1W / 6 matches
League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 51.7
League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 49.8
0W / 1 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.02
Actual: 0.8 | Diff: +0.02
Attack: 29.4, Defense: 47.0, Form: 26.4
Attack: 26.6, Defense: 46.6, Form: 20.0
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
KFUM
Kristiansund
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
On paper, these teams are closely aligned, and the data backs that up. Raw statistics can be misleading without context, but strength-of-opponent adjustments reinforce just how competitive this matchup is. Neither side has padded their numbers against weak opposition.
Kristiansund has earned their numbers the hard way, posting a SoS of 49.9 against considerably stronger competition than KFUM (SoS: 38.1). Their figures deserve greater analytical credence as a result — forged against genuinely difficult opponents.
Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with KFUM averaging 1.0 and Kristiansund averaging 0.8 goals per match.
Defensively, KFUM and Kristiansund are evenly matched, allowing 1.4 and 1.6 goals per game respectively.
Kristiansund has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.4 total goals. Going Under 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.
❄️ Form Momentum: Kristiansund is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.
💡 Why This Matters: Kristiansund's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.
Statistically, there is very little to choose between these two teams. The numbers point to an evenly contested match where fine details and in-game decisions will likely prove decisive.
In their recent Norwegian Eliteserien match (2026-08-02), KFUM prevailed 2-1 against Kristiansund. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. KFUM secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 2-1 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Kristiansund will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. KFUM will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
KFUM
Kristiansund
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
KFUM
3W 2D 5L · 10 goals scored · 14 conceded
Kristiansund
2W 1D 7L · 8 goals scored · 16 conceded
Popular Teams