Skip to content
Compare KFUM vs Kryvbas KR

KFUM vs Kryvbas KR Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare KFUM vs Kryvbas KR: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

KFUM KFUM Home Team
Kryvbas KR Kryvbas KR Away Team
KFUM
32.8
D W L L D W L D L L

Last 10 Matches

Kryvbas KR
61.5
D L W W D L W W L W

Performance Radar

KFUM
Kryvbas KR

Categories Won

2

KFUM

1

Draw

12

Kryvbas KR

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

50%

5W, 2D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

2.2

22 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-7

-7

+3

+3

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
T. Haltvik (3 goals)
G. Mendoza (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 3
1st Half: 13 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
37.8

League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 50.9

68.3

League Difficulty: 98.0, Opponent Quality: 65.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.79

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.21

2.96

Actual: 2.2 | Diff: -0.76

Adjusted Power Rating
32.8

Attack: 29.3, Defense: 38.0, Form: 17.6

61.5

Attack: 86.8, Defense: 43.4, Form: 59.1

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

4
3

16-30'

3
2

31-45'

4
2

46-60'

4
1

61-75'

4

76-90+'

3
KFUM
Kryvbas KR
KFUM

Power Rating Breakdown

32.8

Overall

Attack 29.3
Defense 38.0
Form 17.6
Consistency 61.3
Kryvbas KR

Power Rating Breakdown

61.5

Overall

Attack 86.8
Defense 43.4
Form 59.1
Consistency 45.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

50.0 vs 98.0

Opponent Quality

50.9 vs 65.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 25%
KFUM logo KFUM
D
Tromsø (50%)
W
Rosenborg (39%)
L
Brann (54%)
L
Viking (71%)
D
Vålerenga (47%)
W
Sarpsborg (42%)
L
HamKam (57%)
D
Aalesund (50%)
Kryvbas KR logo Kryvbas KR
D
Oleksandria (57%)
L
Shakhtar D (78%)
W
Veres Rivne (64%)
W
Karpaty Lviv (77%)
D
SK Poltava (54%)
L
Dynamo Kyiv (77%)
W
Rukh Vynnyky (45%)
W
Kudrivka (60%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Tromsø H
0 - 0 D
50%
Rosenborg H
2 - 0 W
39%
Brann A
1 - 2 L
54%
Viking H
0 - 2 L
71%
Vålerenga A
2 - 2 D
47%
Sarpsborg H
1 - 0 W
42%
HamKam A
0 - 4 L
57%
Aalesund A
2 - 2 D
50%
Sandefjord H
1 - 2 L
47%
Fredrikstad A
1 - 3 L
52%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Oleksandria A
1 - 1 D
57%
Shakhtar D H
2 - 3 L
78%
Veres Rivne A
3 - 1 W
64%
Karpaty Lviv H
1 - 0 W
77%
SK Poltava A
3 - 3 D
54%
Dynamo Kyiv H
5 - 6 L
77%
Rukh Vynnyky H
3 - 0 W
45%
Kudrivka A
2 - 1 W
60%
LNZ Cherkasy H
0 - 3 L
73%
Epitsentr H
2 - 1 W
67%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Kryvbas KR has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 68.3) compared to KFUM (SoS: 37.8). This means Kryvbas KR's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Kryvbas KR's attack is on another level, averaging 2.2 goals per match with G. Mendoza leading the charge with 5 goals. KFUM manages just 1.0 per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with KFUM conceding 1.7 and Kryvbas KR conceding 1.9 per match.

Kryvbas KR has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.4 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Kryvbas KR emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (61.5 vs 32.8) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

KFUM

KFUM

VS
Kryvbas KR

Kryvbas KR

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

KFUM

2W 3D 5L · 10 goals scored · 17 conceded

Kryvbas KR

5W 2D 3L · 22 goals scored · 19 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or