Skip to content
Compare KFUM vs Radomiak

KFUM vs Radomiak Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare KFUM vs Radomiak: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

KFUM KFUM Home Team
Radomiak Radomiak Away Team
KFUM
32.8
D W L L D W L D L L

Last 10 Matches

Radomiak
41.4
L L D W W W L D L D

Performance Radar

KFUM
Radomiak

Categories Won

2

KFUM

5

Draw

8

Radomiak

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

30%

3W, 3D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-7

-7

-5

-5

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
T. Haltvik (3 goals)
A. Tapsoba (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 3
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
37.8

League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 50.9

55.0

League Difficulty: 57.0, Opponent Quality: 53.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.79

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.21

1.22

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.02

Adjusted Power Rating
32.8

Attack: 29.3, Defense: 38.0, Form: 17.6

41.4

Attack: 42.0, Defense: 45.5, Form: 31.5

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

2
3

16-30'

1
2

31-45'

1
2

46-60'

2
1

61-75'

3

76-90+'

3
KFUM
Radomiak
KFUM

Power Rating Breakdown

32.8

Overall

Attack 29.3
Defense 38.0
Form 17.6
Consistency 61.3
Radomiak

Power Rating Breakdown

41.4

Overall

Attack 42.0
Defense 45.5
Form 31.5
Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

50.0 vs 57.0

Opponent Quality

50.9 vs 53.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
KFUM logo KFUM
D
Tromsø (50%)
W
Rosenborg (39%)
L
Brann (54%)
L
Viking (71%)
D
Vålerenga (47%)
W
Sarpsborg (42%)
L
HamKam (57%)
D
Aalesund (50%)
Radomiak logo Radomiak
L
Górnik (69%)
L
Lech (67%)
D
Cracovia (49%)
W
Lechia (38%)
W
Wisła Płock (51%)
W
Widzew (54%)
L
Zagłębie (44%)
D
Motor (48%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Tromsø H
0 - 0 D
50%
Rosenborg H
2 - 0 W
39%
Brann A
1 - 2 L
54%
Viking H
0 - 2 L
71%
Vålerenga A
2 - 2 D
47%
Sarpsborg H
1 - 0 W
42%
HamKam A
0 - 4 L
57%
Aalesund A
2 - 2 D
50%
Sandefjord H
1 - 2 L
47%
Fredrikstad A
1 - 3 L
52%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Górnik A
2 - 6 L
69%
Lech H
1 - 3 L
67%
Cracovia A
0 - 0 D
49%
Lechia H
3 - 1 W
38%
Wisła Płock A
1 - 0 W
51%
Widzew H
2 - 1 W
54%
Zagłębie A
0 - 1 L
44%
Motor H
1 - 1 D
48%
Piast A
1 - 3 L
54%
Legia H
1 - 1 D
62%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Radomiak has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 55.0) compared to KFUM (SoS: 37.8). This means Radomiak's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with KFUM averaging 1.0 and Radomiak averaging 1.2 goals per match.

Both defenses are comparable, with KFUM conceding 1.7 and Radomiak conceding 1.7 per match.

Radomiak has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Radomiak has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 8.6 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

KFUM

KFUM

VS
Radomiak

Radomiak

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

KFUM

2W 3D 5L · 10 goals scored · 17 conceded

Radomiak

3W 3D 4L · 12 goals scored · 17 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or