Skip to content
Compare Kidderminster vs Macclesfield

Kidderminster vs Macclesfield Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Kidderminster vs Macclesfield: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Kidderminster Kidderminster Home Team
Macclesfield Macclesfield Away Team
Kidderminster
82.2
W W W W W W W W W W

Last 10 Matches

Macclesfield
37.0
W D D L W L W L L W

Performance Radar

Kidderminster
Macclesfield

Categories Won

11

Kidderminster

2

Draw

2

Macclesfield

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
100%

10W, 0D, 0L

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
2.7

27 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.6

6 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+21

+21

-2

-2

Clean Sheet
50%

5 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
K. Donnelly (6 goals)
J. Kay (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 12 / 2nd Half: 15
1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 15
Home Win Rate
100%

3W / 3 matches

67%

2W / 3 matches

Away Win Rate
100%

7W / 7 matches

29%

2W / 7 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
37.3

League Difficulty: 34.5, Opponent Quality: 39.2

29.7

League Difficulty: 34.5, Opponent Quality: 45.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.33

Actual: 2.7 | Diff: +0.37

1.59

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.01

Adjusted Power Rating
82.2

Attack: 78.6, Defense: 69.8, Form: 87.3

37.0

Attack: 42.5, Defense: 31.9, Form: 31.9

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

3

16-30'

1
6

31-45'

4

46-60'

1
1

61-75'

2
2

76-90+'

4
Kidderminster
Macclesfield
Kidderminster

Power Rating Breakdown

82.2

Overall

Attack 78.6
Defense 69.8
Form 87.3
Consistency 100.0
Macclesfield

Power Rating Breakdown

37.0

Overall

Attack 42.5
Defense 31.9
Form 31.9
Consistency 44.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

34.5 vs 34.5

Opponent Quality

39.2 vs 45.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Kidderminster logo Kidderminster
W
Stratford (43%)
W
Halesowen (43%)
W
Droitwich Spa (43%)
W
South Shields (47%)
W
Macclesfield (39%)
W
South Shields (42%)
W
Leamington (31%)
W
Radcliffe (30%)
Macclesfield logo Macclesfield
W
Altrincham (48%)
D
Warrington (44%)
D
Leek (47%)
L
Kidderminster (72%)
W
Chester (46%)
L
Radcliffe (30%)
W
Southport (44%)
L
Spennymoor (40%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Stratford A
5 - 0 W
43%
Halesowen A
2 - 0 W
43%
Droitwich Spa A
2 - 0 W
43%
South Shields A
2 - 0 W
47%
Macclesfield H
3 - 1 W
39%
South Shields H
1 - 0 W
42%
Leamington A
3 - 2 W
31%
Radcliffe A
3 - 1 W
30%
King's Lynn H
4 - 1 W
35%
Telford A
2 - 1 W
39%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Altrincham A
5 - 2 W
48%
Warrington A
2 - 2 D
44%
Leek A
1 - 1 D
47%
Kidderminster A
1 - 3 L
72%
Chester H
2 - 1 W
46%
Radcliffe A
0 - 1 L
30%
Southport H
2 - 1 W
44%
Spennymoor H
0 - 2 L
40%
South Shields A
1 - 4 L
47%
Merthyr A
2 - 1 W
35%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule adjustment reveals a significant quality gap. The favorite has been tested against tougher opposition and has consistently delivered.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 37.3 vs 29.7), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Kidderminster possess a formidable attacking unit, with K. Donnelly accounting for 6 goals and the squad maintaining an impressive 2.7 goals per game — a threat no opponent can afford to overlook.

Kidderminster holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 0.6 goals per game and recording 5 clean sheets, compared to Macclesfield's leaky backline that surrenders 1.8 goals per match.

Kidderminster has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Kidderminster has an exceptional home record with a 100% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.

Kidderminster is a strong road performer with a 100% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.4 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.

🔥 Form Momentum: Kidderminster is in scorching form, winning 10 of their last 10 matches with 27 goals scored. This level of consistency is difficult to sustain but devastating while it lasts.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Kidderminster is on the rise with 10W in last 10, while Macclesfield shows signs of decline with 4W in last 10.

💡 Why This Matters: The 45.2-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Kidderminster. In practical terms, Kidderminster would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Based on our comprehensive analysis including opponent quality adjustment, Kidderminster is the clear and dominant favorite. With a power rating of 82.2 vs 37.0, and superior metrics across the board, Kidderminster should win this comfortably.

In their recent National League N / S match (2026-05-02), Kidderminster prevailed 3-1 against Macclesfield. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Kidderminster secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. Macclesfield will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Kidderminster will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Kidderminster

Kidderminster

VS
Macclesfield

Macclesfield

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Kidderminster

10W 0D 0L · 27 goals scored · 6 conceded

Macclesfield

4W 2D 4L · 16 goals scored · 18 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or