Korea DPR vs Chinese Taipei Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Korea DPR vs Chinese Taipei: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Korea DPR
Home Team
Chinese Taipei
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Korea DPR
Draw
Chinese Taipei
Statistical Comparison
4W, 1D, 2L
5W, 0D, 3L
20 / 7 matches
11 / 8 matches
7 / 7 matches
9 / 8 matches
+13
+2
3 / 7 matches
4 / 8 matches
6 / 7 matches
3 / 8 matches
4 / 7 matches
1 / 8 matches
2W / 4 matches
1W / 2 matches
2W / 3 matches
4W / 6 matches
League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 54.7
League Difficulty: 58.1, Opponent Quality: 54.1
1W / 2 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 2.9 | Diff: +0.07
Actual: 1.4 | Diff: +0.04
Attack: 100, Defense: 69.1, Form: 59.1
Attack: 49.3, Defense: 66.9, Form: 65.5
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Korea DPR
Chinese Taipei
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.
With comparable strength of schedule figures (53.6 vs 55.7), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.
Korea DPR possess a formidable attacking unit, with Myong Yu-Jong accounting for 4 goals and the squad maintaining an impressive 2.9 goals per game — a threat no opponent can afford to overlook.
Both defenses are comparable, with Korea DPR conceding 1.0 and Chinese Taipei conceding 1.1 per match.
Chinese Taipei has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Chinese Taipei is a strong road performer with a 67% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being unlikely.
📈 Form Momentum: Korea DPR has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.86 points per game over their last 7 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
📈 Form Momentum: Chinese Taipei has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.88 points per game over their last 8 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
💡 Why This Matters: The 15.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Korea DPR. In practical terms, Korea DPR would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
The numbers point firmly toward Korea DPR in this contest. Their superior power rating of 71.7, compared to 56.7 for the opposition, reflects a meaningful edge across the metrics that matter most when projecting an outcome.
In the AFC Women's Asian Cup (2026-03-19), Korea DPR eliminated Chinese Taipei with a 0-4 result. Cup matches bring a unique intensity, and Korea DPR showed they can handle the pressure. Notably, Korea DPR achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Chinese Taipei shows genuine quality and mental strength. The 0-4 scoreline was emphatic — Korea DPR completely dominated Chinese Taipei in that encounter, raising serious questions about Chinese Taipei's ability to compete at this level. Chinese Taipei will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Korea DPR will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Korea DPR
Chinese Taipei
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Korea DPR
4W 1D 2L · 20 goals scored · 7 conceded
Chinese Taipei
5W 0D 3L · 11 goals scored · 9 conceded
Popular Teams