Skip to content
Compare Korea DPR vs Chinese Taipei

Korea DPR vs Chinese Taipei Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Korea DPR vs Chinese Taipei: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Korea DPR Korea DPR Home Team
Chinese Taipei Chinese Taipei Away Team
Korea DPR
71.7
W L L W W D W

Last 10 Matches

Chinese Taipei
56.7
L L W W L W W W

Performance Radar

Korea DPR
Chinese Taipei

Categories Won

9

Korea DPR

3

Draw

3

Chinese Taipei

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
57%

4W, 1D, 2L

62%

5W, 0D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
2.9

20 / 7 matches

1.4

11 / 8 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.0

7 / 7 matches

1.1

9 / 8 matches

Goal Difference
+13

+13

+2

+2

Clean Sheet
43%

3 / 7 matches

50%

4 / 8 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
86%

6 / 7 matches

38%

3 / 8 matches

Both Teams to Score
57%

4 / 7 matches

12%

1 / 8 matches

Top Scorer
Myong Yu-Jong (4 goals)
Su Yu-hsuan (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 13
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

50%

1W / 2 matches

Away Win Rate
67%

2W / 3 matches

67%

4W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
53.6

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 54.7

55.7

League Difficulty: 58.1, Opponent Quality: 54.1

Elite Opponent Record
50%

1W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.79

Actual: 2.9 | Diff: +0.07

1.34

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: +0.04

Adjusted Power Rating
71.7

Attack: 100, Defense: 69.1, Form: 59.1

56.7

Attack: 49.3, Defense: 66.9, Form: 65.5

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

1
3

31-45'

4

46-60'

1
4

61-75'

1

76-90+'

1
Korea DPR
Chinese Taipei
Korea DPR

Power Rating Breakdown

71.7

Overall

Attack 100
Defense 69.1
Form 59.1
Consistency 44.9
Chinese Taipei

Power Rating Breakdown

56.7

Overall

Attack 49.3
Defense 66.9
Form 65.5
Consistency 36.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 58.1

Opponent Quality

54.7 vs 54.1

Elite Opponent Record

50% vs 0%
Korea DPR logo Korea DPR
W
Chinese Taipei (54%)
L
Australia (66%)
L
China (51%)
W
Bangladesh (29%)
W
Uzbekistan (39%)
D
Football Union of Russia (72%)
W
Football Union of Russia (72%)
Chinese Taipei logo Chinese Taipei
L
Korea DPR (55%)
L
China (56%)
W
India (31%)
W
Vietnam (33%)
L
Japan (68%)
W
Nepal (64%)
W
Indonesia (64%)
W
Philippines (62%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Chinese Taipei A
4 - 0 W
54%
Australia A
1 - 2 L
66%
China H
1 - 2 L
51%
Bangladesh A
5 - 0 W
29%
Uzbekistan H
3 - 0 W
39%
Football Union of Russia H
1 - 1 D
72%
Football Union of Russia H
5 - 2 W
72%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Korea DPR H
0 - 4 L
55%
China A
0 - 2 L
56%
India A
3 - 1 W
31%
Vietnam H
1 - 0 W
33%
Japan A
0 - 2 L
68%
Nepal A
1 - 0 W
64%
Indonesia A
5 - 0 W
64%
Philippines A
1 - 0 W
62%

AI Analysis

Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (53.6 vs 55.7), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Korea DPR possess a formidable attacking unit, with Myong Yu-Jong accounting for 4 goals and the squad maintaining an impressive 2.9 goals per game — a threat no opponent can afford to overlook.

Both defenses are comparable, with Korea DPR conceding 1.0 and Chinese Taipei conceding 1.1 per match.

Chinese Taipei has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Chinese Taipei is a strong road performer with a 67% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being unlikely.

📈 Form Momentum: Korea DPR has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.86 points per game over their last 7 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📈 Form Momentum: Chinese Taipei has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.88 points per game over their last 8 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

💡 Why This Matters: The 15.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Korea DPR. In practical terms, Korea DPR would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers point firmly toward Korea DPR in this contest. Their superior power rating of 71.7, compared to 56.7 for the opposition, reflects a meaningful edge across the metrics that matter most when projecting an outcome.

In the AFC Women's Asian Cup (2026-03-19), Korea DPR eliminated Chinese Taipei with a 0-4 result. Cup matches bring a unique intensity, and Korea DPR showed they can handle the pressure. Notably, Korea DPR achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Chinese Taipei shows genuine quality and mental strength. The 0-4 scoreline was emphatic — Korea DPR completely dominated Chinese Taipei in that encounter, raising serious questions about Chinese Taipei's ability to compete at this level. Chinese Taipei will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Korea DPR will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Korea DPR

Korea DPR

VS
Chinese Taipei

Chinese Taipei

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Korea DPR

4W 1D 2L · 20 goals scored · 7 conceded

Chinese Taipei

5W 0D 3L · 11 goals scored · 9 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or