Skip to content
Compare Kudrivka vs Jaro

Kudrivka vs Jaro Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Kudrivka vs Jaro: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Kudrivka Kudrivka Home Team
Jaro Jaro Away Team
Kudrivka
39.8
L W W L D L L L L L

Last 10 Matches

Jaro
27.9
W L D L L L W L L L

Performance Radar

Kudrivka
Jaro

Categories Won

7

Kudrivka

5

Draw

3

Jaro

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 1D, 7L

20%

2W, 1D, 7L

Goals Scored / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

2.7

27 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-7

-7

-16

-16

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
A. Storchous (5 goals)
H. Sjögrell (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 4
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 3
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
67.5

League Difficulty: 98.0, Opponent Quality: 72.4

48.7

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 51.2

Elite Opponent Record
12%

1W / 8 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.22

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.42

1.08

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.02

Adjusted Power Rating
39.8

Attack: 31.3, Defense: 58.8, Form: 23.5

27.9

Attack: 36.2, Defense: 9.9, Form: 19.7

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

2

16-30'

4
2

31-45'

2
1

46-60'

2

61-75'

3

76-90+'

1
Kudrivka
Jaro
Kudrivka

Power Rating Breakdown

39.8

Overall

Attack 31.3
Defense 58.8
Form 23.5
Consistency 57.7
Jaro

Power Rating Breakdown

27.9

Overall

Attack 36.2
Defense 9.9
Form 19.7
Consistency 57.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

98.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

72.4 vs 51.2

Elite Opponent Record

12% vs 0%
Kudrivka logo Kudrivka
L
Dynamo Kyiv (82%)
W
LNZ Cherkasy (73%)
W
Rukh Vynnyky (45%)
L
Kolos (82%)
D
Obolon (61%)
L
Shakhtar D (78%)
L
Metalist 1925 (80%)
L
Kryvbas KR (72%)
Jaro logo Jaro
W
Ilves (46%)
L
TPS (46%)
D
Gnistan (56%)
L
Ilves (51%)
L
HJK (49%)
L
Oulu (54%)
W
Mariehamn (22%)
L
KuPS (67%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dynamo Kyiv A
2 - 3 L
82%
LNZ Cherkasy H
1 - 0 W
73%
Rukh Vynnyky H
2 - 1 W
45%
Kolos A
0 - 1 L
82%
Obolon A
1 - 1 D
61%
Shakhtar D H
1 - 3 L
78%
Metalist 1925 A
0 - 1 L
80%
Kryvbas KR H
1 - 2 L
72%
Epitsentr A
0 - 1 L
72%
Polissya H
0 - 2 L
79%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Ilves H
2 - 1 W
46%
TPS A
2 - 3 L
46%
Gnistan H
1 - 1 D
56%
Ilves A
0 - 5 L
51%
HJK H
2 - 5 L
49%
Oulu A
1 - 2 L
54%
Mariehamn H
3 - 0 W
22%
KuPS A
0 - 3 L
67%
Gnistan A
0 - 5 L
60%
Inter Turku A
0 - 2 L
61%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Kudrivka has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 67.5) compared to Jaro (SoS: 48.7). This means Kudrivka's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Jaro holds the attacking edge with 1.1 goals per match versus Kudrivka's 0.8, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Defensively, Kudrivka is far superior, conceding just 1.5 goals per match with 1 clean sheets, while Jaro leaks 2.7 per match.

Kudrivka has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 8 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Jaro has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Kudrivka has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 11.9 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Kudrivka

Kudrivka

VS
Jaro

Jaro

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Kudrivka

2W 1D 7L · 8 goals scored · 15 conceded

Jaro

2W 1D 7L · 11 goals scored · 27 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or