Skip to content
Compare KuPS vs Epitsentr

KuPS vs Epitsentr Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare KuPS vs Epitsentr: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

KuPS KuPS Home Team
Epitsentr Epitsentr Away Team
KuPS
56.6
W W W D D W W D D L

Last 10 Matches

Epitsentr
49.6
D D W D D D D L W L

Performance Radar

KuPS
Epitsentr

Categories Won

9

KuPS

3

Draw

3

Epitsentr

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 4D, 1L

20%

2W, 6D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+8

+8

0

0

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Moreno (4 goals)
V. Sydun (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
45.5

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 45.9

67.8

League Difficulty: 98.0, Opponent Quality: 67.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.74

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.06

1.46

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.26

Adjusted Power Rating
56.6

Attack: 57.3, Defense: 63.7, Form: 47.8

49.6

Attack: 47.1, Defense: 70.7, Form: 23.6

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

4
2

16-30'

8

31-45'

1
2

46-60'

5
3

61-75'

1
3

76-90+'

1
KuPS
Epitsentr
KuPS

Power Rating Breakdown

56.6

Overall

Attack 57.3
Defense 63.7
Form 47.8
Consistency 61.3
Epitsentr

Power Rating Breakdown

49.6

Overall

Attack 47.1
Defense 70.7
Form 23.6
Consistency 71.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 98.0

Opponent Quality

45.9 vs 67.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 20%
KuPS logo KuPS
W
HJK (54%)
W
Ilves (46%)
W
TPS (46%)
D
VPS (63%)
D
Inter Turku (56%)
W
Lahti (43%)
W
Jaro (29%)
D
Mariehamn (27%)
Epitsentr logo Epitsentr
D
SK Poltava (49%)
D
Metalist 1925 (80%)
W
Polissya (79%)
D
Obolon (61%)
D
Veres Rivne (64%)
D
Oleksandria (52%)
D
Karpaty Lviv (77%)
L
Zorya (79%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
HJK A
4 - 0 W
54%
Ilves H
4 - 3 W
46%
TPS A
2 - 1 W
46%
VPS A
1 - 1 D
63%
Inter Turku H
1 - 1 D
56%
Lahti H
2 - 1 W
43%
Jaro H
3 - 0 W
29%
Mariehamn A
1 - 1 D
27%
SJK H
0 - 0 D
41%
Oulu A
0 - 2 L
54%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
SK Poltava H
0 - 0 D
49%
Metalist 1925 A
1 - 1 D
80%
Polissya H
3 - 2 W
79%
Obolon A
2 - 2 D
61%
Veres Rivne A
3 - 3 D
64%
Oleksandria H
1 - 1 D
52%
Karpaty Lviv H
0 - 0 D
77%
Zorya A
0 - 1 L
79%
Kudrivka H
1 - 0 W
55%
Kryvbas KR A
1 - 2 L
77%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Epitsentr has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 67.8) compared to KuPS (SoS: 45.5). This means Epitsentr's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

KuPS holds the attacking edge with 1.8 goals per match versus Epitsentr's 1.2, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with KuPS conceding 1.0 and Epitsentr conceding 1.2 per match.

KuPS has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Epitsentr has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.6 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

KuPS has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 7.0 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

KuPS

KuPS

VS
Epitsentr

Epitsentr

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

KuPS

5W 4D 1L · 18 goals scored · 10 conceded

Epitsentr

2W 6D 2L · 12 goals scored · 12 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or