Skip to content
Compare Lillestrøm vs KFUM

Lillestrøm vs KFUM Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Lillestrøm vs KFUM: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Lillestrøm Lillestrøm Home Team
KFUM KFUM Away Team
Lillestrøm
35.7
D D L L L W W L L W

Last 10 Matches

KFUM
35.9
D W W L L L D W L L

Performance Radar

Lillestrøm
KFUM

Categories Won

3

Lillestrøm

6

Draw

6

KFUM

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 2D, 5L

30%

3W, 2D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-5

-5

-4

-4

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
G. Nyheim (3 goals)
B. Njie (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 3
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

29%

2W / 7 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

33%

1W / 3 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
39.7

League Difficulty: 53.5, Opponent Quality: 52.2

38.1

League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 51.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.87

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.13

1.02

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.02

Adjusted Power Rating
35.7

Attack: 29.9, Defense: 44.9, Form: 26.9

35.9

Attack: 29.4, Defense: 47.0, Form: 26.4

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

3

16-30'

3

31-45'

2

46-60'

3
3

61-75'

3

76-90+'

1
Lillestrøm
KFUM
Lillestrøm

Power Rating Breakdown

35.7

Overall

Attack 29.9
Defense 44.9
Form 26.9
Consistency 49.3
KFUM

Power Rating Breakdown

35.9

Overall

Attack 29.4
Defense 47.0
Form 26.4
Consistency 49.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

53.5 vs 50.0

Opponent Quality

52.2 vs 51.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Lillestrøm logo Lillestrøm
D
Egnatia (78%)
D
KFUM (47%)
L
Rosenborg (51%)
L
Bodø/Glimt (75%)
L
Viking (59%)
W
KFUM (42%)
W
Fredrikstad (53%)
L
HamKam (44%)
KFUM logo KFUM
D
Lillestrøm (42%)
W
Sandefjord (43%)
W
Kristiansund (35%)
L
Molde (48%)
L
Lillestrøm (47%)
L
Bodø/Glimt (70%)
D
Tromsø (58%)
W
Rosenborg (51%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Egnatia A
0 - 0 D
78%
KFUM A
1 - 1 D
47%
Rosenborg H
0 - 2 L
51%
Bodø/Glimt A
0 - 4 L
75%
Viking H
1 - 2 L
59%
KFUM H
2 - 1 W
42%
Fredrikstad A
2 - 0 W
53%
HamKam A
0 - 2 L
44%
Kristiansund H
1 - 2 L
35%
Sandefjord H
3 - 1 W
38%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Lillestrøm H
1 - 1 D
42%
Sandefjord A
1 - 0 W
43%
Kristiansund H
2 - 1 W
35%
Molde H
2 - 4 L
48%
Lillestrøm A
1 - 2 L
47%
Bodø/Glimt H
0 - 2 L
70%
Tromsø H
0 - 0 D
58%
Rosenborg H
2 - 0 W
51%
Brann A
1 - 2 L
64%
Viking H
0 - 2 L
59%

AI Analysis

Two well-matched sides make for a compelling statistical comparison here. Surface-level metrics only scratch the surface — once we factor in strength of schedule, the analysis gains real depth. The numbers both teams have posted reflect performances against broadly similar competition.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 39.7 vs 38.1), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Lillestrøm averaging 1.0 and KFUM averaging 1.0 goals per match.

Defensively, Lillestrøm and KFUM are evenly matched, allowing 1.5 and 1.4 goals per game respectively.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.5 total goals. Going Under 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking possible given current form.

⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.

💡 Why This Matters: Lillestrøm's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

The data offers no clear edge here. These sides are separated by the finest of margins across every key metric, making the final result almost impossible to call in advance.

These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. These two teams drew 1-1 in the Norwegian Eliteserien (2026-08-15). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning. In their recent Norwegian Eliteserien match (2026-07-18), Lillestrøm prevailed 2-1 against KFUM. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Lillestrøm secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 2-1 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. KFUM will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Lillestrøm will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Lillestrøm

Lillestrøm

VS
KFUM

KFUM

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Lillestrøm

3W 2D 5L · 10 goals scored · 15 conceded

KFUM

3W 2D 5L · 10 goals scored · 14 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or