Skip to content
Compare Lincoln vs Huddersfield

Lincoln vs Huddersfield Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Lincoln vs Huddersfield: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Lincoln Lincoln Home Team
Huddersfield Huddersfield Away Team
Lincoln
63.5
L W W W D W W W W D

Last 10 Matches

Huddersfield
49.0
W L L W W L D D D W

Performance Radar

Lincoln
Huddersfield

Categories Won

8

Lincoln

3

Draw

4

Huddersfield

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
70%

7W, 2D, 1L

40%

4W, 3D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
2.0

20 / 10 matches

2.1

21 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+9

+9

+2

+2

Clean Sheet
40%

4 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

90%

9 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

90%

9 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
B. House (4 goals)
M. Harness (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 12 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 18
Home Win Rate
80%

4W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
45.0

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 45.0

48.2

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 50.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.85

Actual: 2.0 | Diff: +0.15

1.82

Actual: 2.1 | Diff: +0.28

Adjusted Power Rating
63.5

Attack: 63.3, Defense: 60.2, Form: 66.5

49.0

Attack: 68.7, Defense: 36.0, Form: 39.3

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

1
4

16-30'

1
5

31-45'

1
3

46-60'

5
1

61-75'

4
5

76-90+'

2
Lincoln
Huddersfield
Lincoln

Power Rating Breakdown

63.5

Overall

Attack 63.3
Defense 60.2
Form 66.5
Consistency 63.7
Huddersfield

Power Rating Breakdown

49.0

Overall

Attack 68.7
Defense 36.0
Form 39.3
Consistency 50.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

45.0 vs 50.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Lincoln logo Lincoln
L
L Orient (34%)
W
Port Vale (58%)
W
Wycombe (44%)
W
Doncaster (66%)
D
Stevenage (44%)
W
L Orient (34%)
W
Reading (43%)
W
Wimbledon (36%)
Huddersfield logo Huddersfield
W
Oldham (35%)
L
Fleetwood (55%)
L
Sheff Utd (58%)
W
Fylde (58%)
W
Wimbledon (41%)
L
Mansfield (52%)
D
Bolton (57%)
D
Cardiff (63%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
L Orient H
0 - 2 L
34%
Port Vale A
2 - 0 W
58%
Wycombe H
4 - 3 W
44%
Doncaster A
2 - 0 W
66%
Stevenage A
2 - 2 D
44%
L Orient H
2 - 1 W
34%
Reading A
2 - 1 W
43%
Wimbledon H
1 - 0 W
36%
Rotherham H
3 - 0 W
37%
Huddersfield A
2 - 2 D
54%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Oldham H
3 - 1 W
35%
Fleetwood A
1 - 2 L
55%
Sheff Utd A
1 - 3 L
58%
Fylde A
2 - 1 W
58%
Wimbledon A
4 - 0 W
41%
Mansfield H
1 - 4 L
52%
Bolton A
3 - 3 D
57%
Cardiff H
1 - 1 D
63%
Wycombe H
3 - 3 D
44%
L Orient A
2 - 1 W
40%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 45.0 vs 48.2), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

The attacking output of Lincoln and Huddersfield is virtually identical, with both sides posting averages of 2.0 and 2.1 goals per game respectively.

Lincoln's backline outperforms Huddersfield's, with 1.1 goals conceded per match versus 1.9.

Lincoln has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Huddersfield has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Lincoln has an exceptional home record with a 80% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.

Lincoln is a strong road performer with a 60% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Statistical modeling projects 3.5 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

🔥 Form Momentum: Lincoln is in scorching form, winning 7 of their last 10 matches with 20 goals scored. This level of consistency is difficult to sustain but devastating while it lasts.

📈 Form Momentum: Huddersfield has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Lincoln is on the rise with 7W in last 10, while Huddersfield shows signs of decline with 4W in last 10.

💡 Why This Matters: The 14.5-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Lincoln. In practical terms, Lincoln would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Lincoln has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 14.5-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

These two teams drew 2-2 in the League One (2026-03-17). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Lincoln

Lincoln

VS
Huddersfield

Huddersfield

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Lincoln

7W 2D 1L · 20 goals scored · 11 conceded

Huddersfield

4W 3D 3L · 21 goals scored · 19 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or