Skip to content
Compare LNZ Cherkasy vs Gent

LNZ Cherkasy vs Gent Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare LNZ Cherkasy vs Gent: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

LNZ Cherkasy LNZ Cherkasy Home Team
Gent Gent Away Team
LNZ Cherkasy
47.0
W L D D D L D W L W

Last 10 Matches

Gent
55.5
D W D W W D D W D L

Performance Radar

LNZ Cherkasy
Gent

Categories Won

4

LNZ Cherkasy

3

Draw

8

Gent

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 4D, 3L

40%

4W, 5D, 1L

Goals Scored / Match
0.5

5 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.6

6 / 10 matches

0.6

6 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-1

-1

+5

+5

Clean Sheet
70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
10%

1 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
0%

0 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
Y. Tverdokhlib (1 goals)
Tiago Araújo (1 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 3
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
62.7

League Difficulty: 83.4, Opponent Quality: 69.6

56.8

League Difficulty: 61.5, Opponent Quality: 53.7

Elite Opponent Record
20%

1W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.66

Actual: 0.5 | Diff: -0.16

1.07

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.03

Adjusted Power Rating
47.0

Attack: 18.8, Defense: 90.2, Form: 33.8

55.5

Attack: 39.2, Defense: 85.4, Form: 42.7

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

16-30'

2
1

31-45'

3
1

46-60'

1
1

61-75'

1

76-90+'

LNZ Cherkasy
Gent
LNZ Cherkasy

Power Rating Breakdown

47.0

Overall

Attack 18.8
Defense 90.2
Form 33.8
Consistency 57.7
Gent

Power Rating Breakdown

55.5

Overall

Attack 39.2
Defense 85.4
Form 42.7
Consistency 63.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

83.4 vs 61.5

Opponent Quality

69.6 vs 53.7

Elite Opponent Record

20% vs 0%
LNZ Cherkasy logo LNZ Cherkasy
W
Chornomorets (77%)
L
Karpaty Lviv (92%)
D
Bukovyna (81%)
D
Gent (72%)
D
Gent (67%)
L
Göztepe (52%)
D
Dinamo Zagreb (69%)
W
Obolon (67%)
Gent logo Gent
D
Hibernian (64%)
W
La Louvière (44%)
D
IFK Göteborg (58%)
W
Mechelen (32%)
W
IFK Göteborg (63%)
D
LNZ Cherkasy (59%)
D
LNZ Cherkasy (64%)
W
Twente (50%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Chornomorets H
2 - 0 W
77%
Karpaty Lviv A
0 - 3 L
92%
Bukovyna A
0 - 0 D
81%
Gent A
0 - 0 D
72%
Gent H
0 - 0 D
67%
Göztepe H
0 - 2 L
52%
Dinamo Zagreb A
0 - 0 D
69%
Obolon A
1 - 0 W
67%
Kudrivka A
0 - 1 L
70%
SK Poltava H
2 - 0 W
49%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Hibernian H
0 - 0 D
64%
La Louvière A
2 - 1 W
44%
IFK Göteborg H
1 - 1 D
58%
Mechelen H
2 - 0 W
32%
IFK Göteborg A
1 - 0 W
63%
LNZ Cherkasy H
0 - 0 D
59%
LNZ Cherkasy A
0 - 0 D
64%
Twente A
2 - 0 W
50%
Twente A
2 - 2 D
50%
Kryvbas KR A
1 - 2 L
53%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 62.7 vs 56.8), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

Offensively, Gent outperforms LNZ Cherkasy with 1.1 goals per match to 0.5, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.

Defensively, LNZ Cherkasy and Gent are evenly matched, allowing 0.6 and 0.6 goals per game respectively.

LNZ Cherkasy has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Gent has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Statistical modeling projects 1.4 goals in this fixture. The data points Under 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at unlikely based on both sides' scoring records.

📈 Form Momentum: Gent has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.7 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

💡 Why This Matters: The 8.5-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 71% win probability for Gent. In practical terms, Gent would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers lean toward Gent, with a 8.5-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.

These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. These two teams drew 0-0 in the UEFA Conference League (2026-07-30). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning. These two teams drew 0-0 in the UEFA Conference League (2026-07-23). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

LNZ Cherkasy

LNZ Cherkasy

VS
Gent

Gent

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

LNZ Cherkasy

3W 4D 3L · 5 goals scored · 6 conceded

Gent

4W 5D 1L · 11 goals scored · 6 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or