LNZ Cherkasy vs Kharkiv Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare LNZ Cherkasy vs Kharkiv: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
LNZ Cherkasy
Home Team
Kharkiv
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
LNZ Cherkasy
Draw
Kharkiv
Statistical Comparison
2W, 5D, 3L
1W, 5D, 4L
4 / 10 matches
10 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
14 / 10 matches
-1
-4
6 / 10 matches
1 / 10 matches
0 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
1 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
1W / 5 matches
0W / 5 matches
1W / 5 matches
1W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 85.4, Opponent Quality: 66.4
League Difficulty: 76.8, Opponent Quality: 61.0
0W / 3 matches
0W / 4 matches
Actual: 0.4 | Diff: -0.09
Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.21
Attack: 14.3, Defense: 89.5, Form: 21.5
Attack: 34.0, Defense: 54.5, Form: 10.2
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
LNZ Cherkasy
Kharkiv
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Two well-matched sides make for a compelling statistical comparison here. Surface-level metrics only scratch the surface — once we factor in strength of schedule, the analysis gains real depth. The numbers both teams have posted reflect performances against broadly similar competition.
Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 57.4 vs 52.1), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.
Offensively, Kharkiv outperforms LNZ Cherkasy with 1.0 goals per match to 0.4, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.
LNZ Cherkasy holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 0.5 goals per game and recording 6 clean sheets, compared to Kharkiv's leaky backline that surrenders 1.4 goals per match.
LNZ Cherkasy has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Kharkiv has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 1.6 total goals. Going Under 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking unlikely given current form.
❄️ Form Momentum: LNZ Cherkasy is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
❄️ Form Momentum: Kharkiv is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
💡 Why This Matters: LNZ Cherkasy's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.
These two teams drew 1-1 in the Ukraine Premier League (2026-04-26). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
LNZ Cherkasy
Kharkiv
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
LNZ Cherkasy
2W 5D 3L · 4 goals scored · 5 conceded
Kharkiv
1W 5D 4L · 10 goals scored · 14 conceded
Popular Teams