Skip to content
Compare LNZ Cherkasy vs Veres Rivne

LNZ Cherkasy vs Veres Rivne Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare LNZ Cherkasy vs Veres Rivne: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

LNZ Cherkasy LNZ Cherkasy Home Team
Veres Rivne Veres Rivne Away Team
LNZ Cherkasy
43.2
D L D W L W D D D L

Last 10 Matches

Veres Rivne
30.5
L L D D L L L D D L

Performance Radar

LNZ Cherkasy
Veres Rivne

Categories Won

8

LNZ Cherkasy

3

Draw

4

Veres Rivne

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 5D, 3L

0%

0W, 4D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
0.4

4 / 10 matches

0.7

7 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.5

5 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-1

-1

-12

-12

Clean Sheet
60%

6 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
0%

0 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
10%

1 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
Y. Tverdokhlib (1 goals)
V. Boiko (1 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 3
1st Half: 0 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
57.4

League Difficulty: 85.4, Opponent Quality: 66.4

52.6

League Difficulty: 76.8, Opponent Quality: 62.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 3 matches

0%

0W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.49

Actual: 0.4 | Diff: -0.09

0.78

Actual: 0.7 | Diff: -0.08

Adjusted Power Rating
43.2

Attack: 14.3, Defense: 89.5, Form: 21.5

30.5

Attack: 23.9, Defense: 37.6, Form: 0.0

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

1

46-60'

2
1

61-75'

1
1

76-90+'

1
LNZ Cherkasy
Veres Rivne
LNZ Cherkasy

Power Rating Breakdown

43.2

Overall

Attack 14.3
Defense 89.5
Form 21.5
Consistency 67.3
Veres Rivne

Power Rating Breakdown

30.5

Overall

Attack 23.9
Defense 37.6
Form 0.0
Consistency 92.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

85.4 vs 76.8

Opponent Quality

66.4 vs 62.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
LNZ Cherkasy logo LNZ Cherkasy
D
Gent (53%)
L
Göztepe (55%)
D
Dinamo Zagreb (67%)
W
Obolon (68%)
L
Kudrivka (69%)
W
SK Poltava (49%)
D
Dynamo Kyiv (75%)
D
Karpaty Lviv (83%)
Veres Rivne logo Veres Rivne
L
Karpaty Lviv (62%)
L
Karpaty Lviv (62%)
D
Nyva Ternopil (45%)
D
Polissya (45%)
L
Kharkiv (60%)
L
Karpaty Lviv (83%)
L
Kryvbas KR (72%)
D
Rukh Lviv (53%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Gent H
0 - 0 D
53%
Göztepe H
0 - 2 L
55%
Dinamo Zagreb A
0 - 0 D
67%
Obolon A
1 - 0 W
68%
Kudrivka A
0 - 1 L
69%
SK Poltava H
2 - 0 W
49%
Dynamo Kyiv H
0 - 0 D
75%
Karpaty Lviv A
0 - 0 D
83%
Kharkiv H
1 - 1 D
60%
Kolos A
0 - 1 L
85%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Karpaty Lviv A
0 - 1 L
62%
Karpaty Lviv A
1 - 5 L
62%
Nyva Ternopil H
1 - 1 D
45%
Polissya H
1 - 1 D
45%
Kharkiv H
0 - 1 L
60%
Karpaty Lviv A
0 - 2 L
83%
Kryvbas KR H
1 - 3 L
72%
Rukh Lviv A
0 - 0 D
53%
Epitsentr H
3 - 3 D
67%
Zorya A
0 - 2 L
75%

AI Analysis

While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (57.4 vs 52.6), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with LNZ Cherkasy averaging 0.4 and Veres Rivne averaging 0.7 goals per match.

The numbers tell a compelling defensive story for LNZ Cherkasy — 0.5 goals conceded per game and 6 clean sheets put them well ahead of Veres Rivne, who give up 1.9 goals per match at the other end.

LNZ Cherkasy has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Veres Rivne has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Statistical modeling projects 1.8 goals in this fixture. The data points Under 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at unlikely based on both sides' scoring records.

❄️ Form Momentum: LNZ Cherkasy is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

❄️ Form Momentum: Veres Rivne is struggling for form, winning just 0 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

💡 Why This Matters: The 12.7-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 82% win probability for LNZ Cherkasy. In practical terms, LNZ Cherkasy would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers lean toward LNZ Cherkasy, with a 12.7-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

LNZ Cherkasy

LNZ Cherkasy

VS
Veres Rivne

Veres Rivne

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

LNZ Cherkasy

2W 5D 3L · 4 goals scored · 5 conceded

Veres Rivne

0W 4D 6L · 7 goals scored · 19 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or