Skip to content
Compare Macclesfield vs Chester

Macclesfield vs Chester Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Macclesfield vs Chester: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Macclesfield Macclesfield Home Team
Chester Chester Away Team
Macclesfield
37.0
W D D L W L W L L W

Last 10 Matches

Chester
48.6
W L L L D W W W W W

Performance Radar

Macclesfield
Chester

Categories Won

5

Macclesfield

3

Draw

7

Chester

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 2D, 4L

60%

6W, 1D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

0.7

7 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-2

-2

+3

+3

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Kay (2 goals)
T. Davies (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 15
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
67%

2W / 3 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
29%

2W / 7 matches

67%

4W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
29.7

League Difficulty: 34.5, Opponent Quality: 45.3

39.2

League Difficulty: 34.5, Opponent Quality: 42.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.59

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.01

0.74

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.26

Adjusted Power Rating
37.0

Attack: 42.5, Defense: 31.9, Form: 31.9

48.6

Attack: 29.7, Defense: 68.4, Form: 53.5

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

3

31-45'

1
1

46-60'

2

61-75'

1
4

76-90+'

3
Macclesfield
Chester
Macclesfield

Power Rating Breakdown

37.0

Overall

Attack 42.5
Defense 31.9
Form 31.9
Consistency 44.8
Chester

Power Rating Breakdown

48.6

Overall

Attack 29.7
Defense 68.4
Form 53.5
Consistency 43.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

34.5 vs 34.5

Opponent Quality

45.3 vs 42.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Macclesfield logo Macclesfield
W
Altrincham (48%)
D
Warrington (44%)
D
Leek (47%)
L
Kidderminster (72%)
W
Chester (46%)
L
Radcliffe (30%)
W
Southport (44%)
L
Spennymoor (40%)
Chester logo Chester
W
Hyde Utd (41%)
L
Stoke (34%)
L
Fleetwood (55%)
L
Macclesfield (44%)
D
King's Lynn (35%)
W
Oxford City (58%)
W
Fylde (46%)
W
Macclesfield (44%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Altrincham A
5 - 2 W
48%
Warrington A
2 - 2 D
44%
Leek A
1 - 1 D
47%
Kidderminster A
1 - 3 L
72%
Chester H
2 - 1 W
46%
Radcliffe A
0 - 1 L
30%
Southport H
2 - 1 W
44%
Spennymoor H
0 - 2 L
40%
South Shields A
1 - 4 L
47%
Merthyr A
2 - 1 W
35%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Hyde Utd A
1 - 0 W
41%
Stoke H
0 - 1 L
34%
Fleetwood A
0 - 2 L
55%
Macclesfield A
1 - 2 L
44%
King's Lynn H
0 - 0 D
35%
Oxford City A
2 - 1 W
58%
Fylde H
1 - 0 W
46%
Macclesfield A
2 - 0 W
44%
Telford H
2 - 1 W
34%
Curzon Ashton A
1 - 0 W
32%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 29.7 vs 39.2), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

Macclesfield leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.6 goals per game compared to Chester's 1.0 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

Chester holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 0.7 goals per game and recording 5 clean sheets, compared to Macclesfield's leaky backline that surrenders 1.8 goals per match.

Chester has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Chester is a strong road performer with a 67% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Statistical modeling projects 2.6 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

📈 Form Momentum: Chester has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.9 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

💡 Why This Matters: The 11.6-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 79% win probability for Chester. In practical terms, Chester would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers lean toward Chester, with a 11.6-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.

These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. In their recent National League N / S match (2026-04-29), Macclesfield prevailed 2-1 against Chester. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Macclesfield secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 2-1 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Chester will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Macclesfield will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost. In their recent National League N / S match (2026-04-06), Chester prevailed 0-2 against Macclesfield. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, Chester achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Macclesfield shows genuine quality and mental strength. Macclesfield will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Chester will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Macclesfield

Macclesfield

VS
Chester

Chester

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Macclesfield

4W 2D 4L · 16 goals scored · 18 conceded

Chester

6W 1D 3L · 10 goals scored · 7 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or