Skip to content
Compare Macclesfield vs Kidderminster

Macclesfield vs Kidderminster Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Macclesfield vs Kidderminster: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Macclesfield Macclesfield Home Team
Kidderminster Kidderminster Away Team
Macclesfield
37.0
W D D L W L W L L W

Last 10 Matches

Kidderminster
82.2
W W W W W W W W W W

Performance Radar

Macclesfield
Kidderminster

Categories Won

2

Macclesfield

2

Draw

11

Kidderminster

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 2D, 4L

100%

10W, 0D, 0L

Goals Scored / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

2.7

27 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

0.6

6 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-2

-2

+21

+21

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Kay (2 goals)
K. Donnelly (6 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 15
1st Half: 12 / 2nd Half: 15
Home Win Rate
67%

2W / 3 matches

100%

3W / 3 matches

Away Win Rate
29%

2W / 7 matches

100%

7W / 7 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
29.7

League Difficulty: 34.5, Opponent Quality: 45.3

37.3

League Difficulty: 34.5, Opponent Quality: 39.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.59

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.01

2.33

Actual: 2.7 | Diff: +0.37

Adjusted Power Rating
37.0

Attack: 42.5, Defense: 31.9, Form: 31.9

82.2

Attack: 78.6, Defense: 69.8, Form: 87.3

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

2
1

16-30'

3

31-45'

6
1

46-60'

4
2

61-75'

1
4

76-90+'

2
Macclesfield
Kidderminster
Macclesfield

Power Rating Breakdown

37.0

Overall

Attack 42.5
Defense 31.9
Form 31.9
Consistency 44.8
Kidderminster

Power Rating Breakdown

82.2

Overall

Attack 78.6
Defense 69.8
Form 87.3
Consistency 100.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

34.5 vs 34.5

Opponent Quality

45.3 vs 39.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Macclesfield logo Macclesfield
W
Altrincham (48%)
D
Warrington (44%)
D
Leek (47%)
L
Kidderminster (72%)
W
Chester (46%)
L
Radcliffe (30%)
W
Southport (44%)
L
Spennymoor (40%)
Kidderminster logo Kidderminster
W
Stratford (43%)
W
Halesowen (43%)
W
Droitwich Spa (43%)
W
South Shields (47%)
W
Macclesfield (39%)
W
South Shields (42%)
W
Leamington (31%)
W
Radcliffe (30%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Altrincham A
5 - 2 W
48%
Warrington A
2 - 2 D
44%
Leek A
1 - 1 D
47%
Kidderminster A
1 - 3 L
72%
Chester H
2 - 1 W
46%
Radcliffe A
0 - 1 L
30%
Southport H
2 - 1 W
44%
Spennymoor H
0 - 2 L
40%
South Shields A
1 - 4 L
47%
Merthyr A
2 - 1 W
35%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Stratford A
5 - 0 W
43%
Halesowen A
2 - 0 W
43%
Droitwich Spa A
2 - 0 W
43%
South Shields A
2 - 0 W
47%
Macclesfield H
3 - 1 W
39%
South Shields H
1 - 0 W
42%
Leamington A
3 - 2 W
31%
Radcliffe A
3 - 1 W
30%
King's Lynn H
4 - 1 W
35%
Telford A
2 - 1 W
39%

AI Analysis

Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 29.7 vs 37.3), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

Kidderminster possess a formidable attacking unit, with K. Donnelly accounting for 6 goals and the squad maintaining an impressive 2.7 goals per game — a threat no opponent can afford to overlook.

Kidderminster holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 0.6 goals per game and recording 5 clean sheets, compared to Macclesfield's leaky backline that surrenders 1.8 goals per match.

Kidderminster has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Kidderminster has an exceptional home record with a 100% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.

Kidderminster is a strong road performer with a 100% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.4 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

🔥 Form Momentum: Kidderminster is in scorching form, winning 10 of their last 10 matches with 27 goals scored. This level of consistency is difficult to sustain but devastating while it lasts.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Kidderminster is on the rise with 10W in last 10, while Macclesfield shows signs of decline with 4W in last 10.

💡 Why This Matters: The 45.2-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Kidderminster. In practical terms, Kidderminster would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Accounting for opponent quality throughout our evaluation, Kidderminster emerges as the heavy favorite by every measurable indicator. A power rating of 82.2 compared to 37.0, combined with across-the-board statistical superiority, projects Kidderminster as the likely winner and by a comfortable margin.

In their recent National League N / S match (2026-05-02), Kidderminster prevailed 3-1 against Macclesfield. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Kidderminster secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. Macclesfield will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Kidderminster will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Macclesfield

Macclesfield

VS
Kidderminster

Kidderminster

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Macclesfield

4W 2D 4L · 16 goals scored · 18 conceded

Kidderminster

10W 0D 0L · 27 goals scored · 6 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or