Metz vs Nice Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Metz vs Nice: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Metz
Home Team
Nice
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Metz
Draw
Nice
Statistical Comparison
3W, 3D, 4L
4W, 4D, 2L
20 / 10 matches
17 / 10 matches
18 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
+2
+9
3 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
3W / 7 matches
2W / 4 matches
0W / 3 matches
2W / 6 matches
League Difficulty: 73.7, Opponent Quality: 56.9
League Difficulty: 61.4, Opponent Quality: 54.6
0W / 2 matches
0W / 2 matches
Actual: 2.0 | Diff: -0.15
Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.05
Attack: 66.3, Defense: 39.8, Form: 29.8
Attack: 53.1, Defense: 68.7, Form: 37.5
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Metz
Nice
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.
With comparable strength of schedule figures (49.4 vs 43.7), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.
Metz leads the attacking statistics, averaging 2.0 goals per game compared to Nice's 1.7 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.
The numbers tell a compelling defensive story for Nice — 0.8 goals conceded per game and 5 clean sheets put them well ahead of Metz, who give up 1.8 goals per match at the other end.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.1 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.
📈 Form Momentum: Nice has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
💡 Why This Matters: The 6.2-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 66% win probability for Nice. In practical terms, Nice would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.
Nice has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 6.2-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.
These two teams drew 0-0 in the French Ligue 1 (2026-05-17). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Metz
Nice
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Metz
3W 3D 4L · 20 goals scored · 18 conceded
Nice
4W 4D 2L · 17 goals scored · 8 conceded
Popular Teams