Skip to content
Compare Minnesota vs Salt Lake

Minnesota vs Salt Lake Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Minnesota vs Salt Lake: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Minnesota Minnesota Home Team
Salt Lake Salt Lake Away Team
Minnesota
42.0
W L D D D L D L L D

Last 10 Matches

Salt Lake
42.9
L L D D L L W D W W

Performance Radar

Minnesota
Salt Lake

Categories Won

3

Minnesota

3

Draw

9

Salt Lake

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 5D, 4L

30%

3W, 3D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
0

0

+2

+2

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

90%

9 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
K. Yeboah (3 goals)
Sergi Solans (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 13
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 6 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
50.7

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 47.9

40.4

League Difficulty: 54.0, Opponent Quality: 53.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.35

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: -0.05

1.67

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.13

Adjusted Power Rating
42.0

Attack: 43.6, Defense: 57.1, Form: 10.1

42.9

Attack: 54.2, Defense: 42.2, Form: 27.1

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

1

16-30'

2
2

31-45'

3
1

46-60'

4
3

61-75'

3
4

76-90+'

2
Minnesota
Salt Lake
Minnesota

Power Rating Breakdown

42.0

Overall

Attack 43.6
Defense 57.1
Form 10.1
Consistency 77.2
Salt Lake

Power Rating Breakdown

42.9

Overall

Attack 54.2
Defense 42.2
Form 27.1
Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 54.0

Opponent Quality

47.9 vs 53.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Minnesota logo Minnesota
W
Earthquakes (38%)
L
Atlanta United (44%)
D
Salt Lake (54%)
D
San Diego (54%)
D
Whitecaps (55%)
L
Sporting KC (46%)
D
Salt Lake (49%)
L
New England (53%)
Salt Lake logo Salt Lake
L
Orlando (54%)
L
Dallas (53%)
D
Minnesota (45%)
D
St. Louis (72%)
L
Portland (58%)
L
LAFC (58%)
W
Burnley (33%)
D
Minnesota (50%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Earthquakes A
5 - 1 W
38%
Atlanta United H
1 - 2 L
44%
Salt Lake A
1 - 1 D
54%
San Diego H
1 - 1 D
54%
Whitecaps H
0 - 0 D
55%
Sporting KC A
1 - 2 L
46%
Salt Lake H
1 - 1 D
49%
New England A
1 - 2 L
53%
Colorado H
0 - 1 L
49%
Austin H
2 - 2 D
37%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Orlando A
1 - 2 L
54%
Dallas H
3 - 4 L
53%
Minnesota H
1 - 1 D
45%
St. Louis A
1 - 1 D
72%
Portland A
1 - 2 L
58%
LAFC A
1 - 3 L
58%
Burnley H
4 - 1 W
33%
Minnesota A
1 - 1 D
50%
Colorado H
2 - 1 W
49%
Houston H
3 - 0 W
65%

AI Analysis

Two well-matched sides make for a compelling statistical comparison here. Surface-level metrics only scratch the surface — once we factor in strength of schedule, the analysis gains real depth. The numbers both teams have posted reflect performances against broadly similar competition.

Minnesota has earned their numbers the hard way, posting a SoS of 50.7 against considerably stronger competition than Salt Lake (SoS: 40.4). Their figures deserve greater analytical credence as a result — forged against genuinely difficult opponents.

Salt Lake holds the attacking edge with 1.8 goals per match versus Minnesota's 1.3, though the gap isn't insurmountable.

Minnesota's backline outperforms Salt Lake's, with 1.3 goals conceded per match versus 1.6.

Minnesota has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Statistical modeling projects 3.0 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

❄️ Form Momentum: Minnesota is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.

💡 Why This Matters: Minnesota's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

The data offers no clear edge here. These sides are separated by the finest of margins across every key metric, making the final result almost impossible to call in advance.

These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. These two teams drew 1-1 in the Major League Soccer (2026-08-16). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning. These two teams drew 1-1 in the Major League Soccer (2026-05-23). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Minnesota

Minnesota

VS
Salt Lake

Salt Lake

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Minnesota

1W 5D 4L · 13 goals scored · 13 conceded

Salt Lake

3W 3D 4L · 18 goals scored · 16 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or