Skip to content
Compare Montpellier vs Clermont

Montpellier vs Clermont Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Montpellier vs Clermont: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Montpellier Montpellier Home Team
Clermont Clermont Away Team
Montpellier
57.2
W L L W W

Last 10 Matches

Clermont
45.6
L D W D

Performance Radar

Montpellier
Clermont

Categories Won

10

Montpellier

2

Draw

3

Clermont

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
60%

3W, 0D, 2L

25%

1W, 2D, 1L

Goals Scored / Match
2.2

11 / 5 matches

1.2

5 / 4 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

7 / 5 matches

0.8

3 / 4 matches

Goal Difference
+4

+4

+2

+2

Clean Sheet
60%

3 / 5 matches

25%

1 / 4 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

3 / 5 matches

25%

1 / 4 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

2 / 5 matches

50%

2 / 4 matches

Top Scorer
Alexandre Mendy (2 goals)
N/A (0 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 0 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 1 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
75%

3W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
47.3

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 48.8

45.1

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 45.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.07

Actual: 2.2 | Diff: +0.13

1.1

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.15

Adjusted Power Rating
57.2

Attack: 71.4, Defense: 51.9, Form: 58.4

45.6

Attack: 38.0, Defense: 69.7, Form: 23.8

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

1

16-30'

31-45'

1

46-60'

2

61-75'

1

76-90+'

Montpellier
Clermont
Montpellier

Power Rating Breakdown

57.2

Overall

Attack 71.4
Defense 51.9
Form 58.4
Consistency 35.2
Clermont

Power Rating Breakdown

45.6

Overall

Attack 38.0
Defense 69.7
Form 23.8
Consistency 64.4

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

48.8 vs 45.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Montpellier logo Montpellier
W
Clermont (48%)
L
Cannes (44%)
L
Nice (59%)
W
Metz (50%)
W
Canet (43%)
Clermont logo Clermont
L
Montpellier (49%)
D
QRM (45%)
W
Andrézieux (42%)
D
Bourges (45%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Clermont A
1 - 0 W
48%
Cannes H
3 - 4 L
44%
Nice A
2 - 3 L
59%
Metz A
4 - 0 W
50%
Canet A
1 - 0 W
43%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Montpellier H
0 - 1 L
49%
QRM H
1 - 1 D
45%
Andrézieux H
4 - 1 W
42%
Bourges H
0 - 0 D
45%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (47.3 vs 45.1), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Montpellier possess a formidable attacking unit, with Alexandre Mendy accounting for 2 goals and the squad maintaining an impressive 2.2 goals per game — a threat no opponent can afford to overlook.

Clermont's backline outperforms Montpellier's, with 0.8 goals conceded per match versus 1.4.

Montpellier has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Clermont has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Montpellier is a strong road performer with a 75% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.8 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking possible given current form.

❄️ Form Momentum: Clermont is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 4 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Montpellier faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If Clermont can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 11.6-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 79% win probability for Montpellier. In practical terms, Montpellier would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

While Montpellier holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 11.6-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.

In their recent Club Friendlies match (2026-07-25), Montpellier prevailed 0-1 against Clermont. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, Montpellier achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Clermont shows genuine quality and mental strength. The narrow 0-1 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Clermont will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Montpellier will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Montpellier

Montpellier

VS
Clermont

Clermont

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Montpellier

3W 0D 2L · 11 goals scored · 7 conceded

Clermont

1W 2D 1L · 5 goals scored · 3 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or