Montrose vs QOTS Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Montrose vs QOTS: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Montrose
Home Team
QOTS
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Montrose
Draw
QOTS
Statistical Comparison
4W, 1D, 5L
3W, 5D, 2L
11 / 10 matches
18 / 10 matches
14 / 10 matches
15 / 10 matches
-3
+3
4 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
2W / 6 matches
1W / 5 matches
2W / 4 matches
2W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 39.0, Opponent Quality: 45.5
League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 47.4
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.12
Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.14
Attack: 34.1, Defense: 49.5, Form: 37.2
Attack: 57.8, Defense: 48.2, Form: 28.9
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Montrose
QOTS
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 42.9 vs 46.4), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
Offensively, QOTS outperforms Montrose with 1.8 goals per match to 1.1, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.
The defensive records are closely aligned, with Montrose giving up 1.4 and QOTS giving up 1.5 per fixture.
Montrose has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
QOTS has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.9 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, QOTS faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.5 goals per match. If Montrose can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 7.8-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 70% win probability for QOTS. In practical terms, QOTS would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.
QOTS has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 7.8-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.
These two teams drew 2-2 in the Scottish League One (2026-04-25). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Montrose
QOTS
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Montrose
4W 1D 5L · 11 goals scored · 14 conceded
QOTS
3W 5D 2L · 18 goals scored · 15 conceded
Popular Teams