Skip to content
Compare Montrose vs QOTS

Montrose vs QOTS Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Montrose vs QOTS: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Montrose Montrose Home Team
QOTS QOTS Away Team
Montrose
39.7
L W W W L D L L L W

Last 10 Matches

QOTS
47.5
L L W D D D W D D W

Performance Radar

Montrose
QOTS

Categories Won

5

Montrose

2

Draw

8

QOTS

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 1D, 5L

30%

3W, 5D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-3

-3

+3

+3

Clean Sheet
40%

4 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
30%

3 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
30%

3 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
E. Loudon (4 goals)
N. Clark (7 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 12
Home Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
42.9

League Difficulty: 39.0, Opponent Quality: 45.5

46.4

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 47.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.98

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.12

1.66

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.14

Adjusted Power Rating
39.7

Attack: 34.1, Defense: 49.5, Form: 37.2

47.5

Attack: 57.8, Defense: 48.2, Form: 28.9

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

2
5

16-30'

2
1

31-45'

1
2

46-60'

1
3

61-75'

5

76-90+'

7
Montrose
QOTS
Montrose

Power Rating Breakdown

39.7

Overall

Attack 34.1
Defense 49.5
Form 37.2
Consistency 39.7
QOTS

Power Rating Breakdown

47.5

Overall

Attack 57.8
Defense 48.2
Form 28.9
Consistency 62.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

39.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

45.5 vs 47.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Montrose logo Montrose
L
Spartans (38%)
W
Arbroath (47%)
W
Stirling (44%)
W
Dundee Utd (48%)
L
Stenhousemuir (47%)
D
QOTS (50%)
L
Hamilton (54%)
L
Kelty Hearts (46%)
QOTS logo QOTS
L
Queen's Park (54%)
L
Aberdeen (60%)
W
Brora Rangers (42%)
D
Kelty Hearts (45%)
D
Stenhousemuir (64%)
D
Stenhousemuir (59%)
W
Alloa Athletic (39%)
D
Montrose (38%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Spartans H
0 - 2 L
38%
Arbroath A
2 - 0 W
47%
Stirling A
2 - 0 W
44%
Dundee Utd H
1 - 0 W
48%
Stenhousemuir H
0 - 2 L
47%
QOTS A
2 - 2 D
50%
Hamilton H
0 - 2 L
54%
Kelty Hearts A
1 - 3 L
46%
Cove Rangers H
2 - 3 L
36%
East Fife H
1 - 0 W
45%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Queen's Park A
1 - 3 L
54%
Aberdeen H
1 - 4 L
60%
Brora Rangers A
3 - 0 W
42%
Kelty Hearts H
1 - 1 D
45%
Stenhousemuir A
2 - 2 D
64%
Stenhousemuir H
1 - 1 D
59%
Alloa Athletic A
4 - 1 W
39%
Montrose H
2 - 2 D
38%
Peterhead A
1 - 1 D
37%
Cove Rangers H
2 - 0 W
36%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 42.9 vs 46.4), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Offensively, QOTS outperforms Montrose with 1.8 goals per match to 1.1, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.

The defensive records are closely aligned, with Montrose giving up 1.4 and QOTS giving up 1.5 per fixture.

Montrose has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

QOTS has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.9 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, QOTS faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.5 goals per match. If Montrose can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 7.8-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 70% win probability for QOTS. In practical terms, QOTS would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

QOTS has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 7.8-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

These two teams drew 2-2 in the Scottish League One (2026-04-25). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Montrose

Montrose

VS
QOTS

QOTS

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Montrose

4W 1D 5L · 11 goals scored · 14 conceded

QOTS

3W 5D 2L · 18 goals scored · 15 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or