Skip to content
Compare NAC vs Heracles

NAC vs Heracles Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare NAC vs Heracles: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

NAC NAC Home Team
Heracles Heracles Away Team
NAC
33.5
W L D W L L D D L L

Last 10 Matches

Heracles
24.6
L L L L L L D L D L

Performance Radar

NAC
Heracles

Categories Won

11

NAC

2

Draw

2

Heracles

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

0%

0W, 2D, 8L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

0.4

4 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.0

20 / 10 matches

2.3

23 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-10

-10

-19

-19

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Soumano (2 goals)
T. van Gilst (1 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 1
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
49.8

League Difficulty: 73.0, Opponent Quality: 58.8

54.6

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 64.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 3 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.23

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.23

0.36

Actual: 0.4 | Diff: +0.04

Adjusted Power Rating
33.5

Attack: 33.3, Defense: 33.3, Form: 20.0

24.6

Attack: 13.9, Defense: 24.4, Form: 0.0

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

3
1

31-45'

46-60'

4

61-75'

2

76-90+'

1
NAC
Heracles
NAC

Power Rating Breakdown

33.5

Overall

Attack 33.3
Defense 33.3
Form 20.0
Consistency 61.3
Heracles

Power Rating Breakdown

24.6

Overall

Attack 13.9
Defense 24.4
Form 0.0
Consistency 95.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

73.0 vs 80.0

Opponent Quality

58.8 vs 64.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
NAC logo NAC
W
Lokeren (47%)
L
Excelsior (50%)
D
AZ (71%)
W
Heerenveen (63%)
L
Utrecht (71%)
L
Ajax (71%)
D
Fortuna (51%)
D
Sparta (44%)
Heracles logo Heracles
L
Groningen (53%)
L
Telstar (73%)
L
Zwolle (54%)
L
Volendam (57%)
L
Ajax (71%)
L
Heerenveen (68%)
D
Excelsior (64%)
L
AZ (71%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Lokeren A
2 - 1 W
47%
Excelsior H
1 - 3 L
50%
AZ A
3 - 3 D
71%
Heerenveen H
2 - 0 W
63%
Utrecht A
0 - 2 L
71%
Ajax H
0 - 2 L
71%
Fortuna A
1 - 1 D
51%
Sparta H
0 - 0 D
44%
Zwolle A
1 - 2 L
54%
Go Ahead A
0 - 6 L
66%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Groningen H
1 - 2 L
53%
Telstar A
0 - 3 L
73%
Zwolle A
0 - 1 L
54%
Volendam H
0 - 2 L
57%
Ajax H
0 - 3 L
71%
Heerenveen A
1 - 4 L
68%
Excelsior H
1 - 1 D
64%
AZ A
0 - 4 L
71%
Utrecht H
0 - 0 D
66%
PSV H
1 - 3 L
70%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (49.8 vs 54.6), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

NAC leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.0 goals per game compared to Heracles's 0.4 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

Defensively, NAC and Heracles are evenly matched, allowing 2.0 and 2.3 goals per game respectively.

NAC has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Heracles has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Statistical modeling projects 2.8 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at possible based on both sides' scoring records.

❄️ Form Momentum: NAC is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

❄️ Form Momentum: Heracles is struggling for form, winning just 0 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, NAC faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 2.0 goals per match. If Heracles can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 8.9-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 72% win probability for NAC. In practical terms, NAC would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers lean toward NAC, with a 8.9-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

NAC

NAC

VS
Heracles

Heracles

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

NAC

2W 3D 5L · 10 goals scored · 20 conceded

Heracles

0W 2D 8L · 4 goals scored · 23 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or