Skip to content
Compare NAC vs Jaro

NAC vs Jaro Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare NAC vs Jaro: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

NAC NAC Home Team
Jaro Jaro Away Team
NAC
31.9
D W L L D D L L D L

Last 10 Matches

Jaro
27.9
W L D L L L W L L L

Performance Radar

NAC
Jaro

Categories Won

6

NAC

3

Draw

6

Jaro

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 4D, 5L

20%

2W, 1D, 7L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.2

22 / 10 matches

2.7

27 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-12

-12

-16

-16

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Soumano (2 goals)
H. Sjögrell (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 3
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 6 matches

0%

0W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
54.3

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 63.8

48.7

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 51.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.27

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.27

1.08

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.02

Adjusted Power Rating
31.9

Attack: 34.8, Defense: 27.8, Form: 10.4

27.9

Attack: 36.2, Defense: 9.9, Form: 19.7

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

2
1

16-30'

4
2

31-45'

2
1

46-60'

2
4

61-75'

2

76-90+'

1
NAC
Jaro
NAC

Power Rating Breakdown

31.9

Overall

Attack 34.8
Defense 27.8
Form 10.4
Consistency 75.7
Jaro

Power Rating Breakdown

27.9

Overall

Attack 36.2
Defense 9.9
Form 19.7
Consistency 57.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

63.8 vs 51.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
NAC logo NAC
D
AZ (68%)
W
Heerenveen (65%)
L
Utrecht (77%)
L
Ajax (68%)
D
Fortuna (56%)
D
Sparta (44%)
L
Zwolle (56%)
L
Go Ahead (64%)
Jaro logo Jaro
W
Ilves (46%)
L
TPS (46%)
D
Gnistan (56%)
L
Ilves (51%)
L
HJK (49%)
L
Oulu (54%)
W
Mariehamn (22%)
L
KuPS (67%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
AZ A
3 - 3 D
68%
Heerenveen H
2 - 0 W
65%
Utrecht A
0 - 2 L
77%
Ajax H
0 - 2 L
68%
Fortuna A
1 - 1 D
56%
Sparta H
0 - 0 D
44%
Zwolle A
1 - 2 L
56%
Go Ahead A
0 - 6 L
64%
Feyenoord H
3 - 3 D
67%
Telstar A
0 - 3 L
73%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Ilves H
2 - 1 W
46%
TPS A
2 - 3 L
46%
Gnistan H
1 - 1 D
56%
Ilves A
0 - 5 L
51%
HJK H
2 - 5 L
49%
Oulu A
1 - 2 L
54%
Mariehamn H
3 - 0 W
22%
KuPS A
0 - 3 L
67%
Gnistan A
0 - 5 L
60%
Inter Turku A
0 - 2 L
61%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 54.3 vs 48.7), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with NAC averaging 1.0 and Jaro averaging 1.1 goals per match.

NAC has the defensive edge, conceding 2.2 per match compared to Jaro's 2.7.

Jaro has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.5 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

NAC

NAC

VS
Jaro

Jaro

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

NAC

1W 4D 5L · 10 goals scored · 22 conceded

Jaro

2W 1D 7L · 11 goals scored · 27 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or