NAC vs Utrecht Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare NAC vs Utrecht: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
NAC
Home Team
Utrecht
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
NAC
Draw
Utrecht
Statistical Comparison
2W, 3D, 5L
6W, 1D, 3L
10 / 10 matches
18 / 10 matches
20 / 10 matches
15 / 10 matches
-10
+3
2 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
1W / 4 matches
4W / 4 matches
1W / 6 matches
2W / 6 matches
League Difficulty: 73.0, Opponent Quality: 58.8
League Difficulty: 73.0, Opponent Quality: 61.5
0W / 3 matches
1W / 3 matches
Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.23
Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.26
Attack: 33.3, Defense: 33.3, Form: 20.0
Attack: 65.4, Defense: 54.5, Form: 65.4
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
NAC
Utrecht
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 49.8 vs 59.0), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
Offensively, Utrecht outperforms NAC with 1.8 goals per match to 1.0, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.
Utrecht's backline outperforms NAC's, with 1.5 goals conceded per match versus 2.0.
NAC has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Utrecht has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Utrecht has an exceptional home record with a 100% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.1 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking possible given current form.
❄️ Form Momentum: NAC is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📈 Form Momentum: Utrecht has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.9 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Utrecht is on the rise with 6W in last 10, while NAC shows signs of decline with 2W in last 10.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Utrecht faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.5 goals per match. If NAC can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 25.9-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Utrecht. In practical terms, Utrecht would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Based on the available data, Utrecht holds the stronger position heading into this matchup. A power rating of 59.4 against 33.5 underlines their overall quality advantage and makes them the logical pick to come out on top.
In their recent Dutch Eredivisie match (2026-05-02), Utrecht prevailed 2-0 against NAC. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Utrecht secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. NAC will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Utrecht will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
NAC
Utrecht
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
NAC
2W 3D 5L · 10 goals scored · 20 conceded
Utrecht
6W 1D 3L · 18 goals scored · 15 conceded
Popular Teams