NEC vs Groningen Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare NEC vs Groningen: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
NEC
Home Team
Groningen
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
NEC
Draw
Groningen
Statistical Comparison
5W, 4D, 1L
3W, 2D, 5L
23 / 10 matches
10 / 10 matches
10 / 10 matches
16 / 10 matches
+13
-6
3 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
3W / 6 matches
1W / 6 matches
2W / 4 matches
2W / 4 matches
League Difficulty: 76.5, Opponent Quality: 62.2
League Difficulty: 69.5, Opponent Quality: 59.9
1W / 2 matches
2W / 4 matches
Actual: 2.3 | Diff: -0.3
Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.12
Attack: 88.1, Defense: 76.6, Form: 57.5
Attack: 37.1, Defense: 51.9, Form: 33.4
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
NEC
Groningen
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.
With comparable strength of schedule figures (64.9 vs 61.3), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.
Few sides can match NEC in front of goal. Their 2.3 average per fixture tells the story, with B. Linssen driving that output personally responsible for 4 goals this campaign.
NEC's backline outperforms Groningen's, with 1.0 goals conceded per match versus 1.6.
Groningen has proven their mettle against elite opponents, winning 2 of 4 matches against top-tier teams. This is a crucial indicator of their ability to perform under pressure.
Statistical modeling projects 3.0 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.
📈 Form Momentum: NEC has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.9 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
💡 Why This Matters: The 30.5-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for NEC. In practical terms, NEC would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Our opponent-adjusted metrics point overwhelmingly in one direction: NEC holds a commanding advantage here. The power rating gap — 72.0 against 41.5 — reinforces what the underlying numbers already suggest, making NEC a strong and justified favorite to win decisively.
In their recent Dutch Eredivisie match (2026-05-10), Groningen prevailed 2-1 against NEC. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Groningen secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 2-1 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. NEC will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Groningen will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
NEC
Groningen
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
NEC
5W 4D 1L · 23 goals scored · 10 conceded
Groningen
3W 2D 5L · 10 goals scored · 16 conceded
Popular Teams