Skip to content
Compare NEC vs Groningen

NEC vs Groningen Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare NEC vs Groningen: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

NEC NEC Home Team
Groningen Groningen Away Team
NEC
72.0
W W L D D D W D W W

Last 10 Matches

Groningen
41.5
D L L L W W L L D W

Performance Radar

NEC
Groningen

Categories Won

10

NEC

5

Draw

0

Groningen

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 4D, 1L

30%

3W, 2D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
2.3

23 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+13

+13

-6

-6

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
B. Linssen (4 goals)
T. Land (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 15
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
50%

3W / 6 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
64.9

League Difficulty: 76.5, Opponent Quality: 62.2

61.3

League Difficulty: 69.5, Opponent Quality: 59.9

Elite Opponent Record
50%

1W / 2 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.6

Actual: 2.3 | Diff: -0.3

1.12

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.12

Adjusted Power Rating
72.0

Attack: 88.1, Defense: 76.6, Form: 57.5

41.5

Attack: 37.1, Defense: 51.9, Form: 33.4

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2
4

16-30'

3

31-45'

1
2

46-60'

4
3

61-75'

3

76-90+'

2
NEC
Groningen
NEC

Power Rating Breakdown

72.0

Overall

Attack 88.1
Defense 76.6
Form 57.5
Consistency 61.3
Groningen

Power Rating Breakdown

41.5

Overall

Attack 37.1
Defense 51.9
Form 33.4
Consistency 49.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

76.5 vs 69.5

Opponent Quality

62.2 vs 59.9

Elite Opponent Record

50% vs 50%
NEC logo NEC
W
Fayha (30%)
W
Go Ahead (61%)
L
Groningen (58%)
D
Telstar (68%)
D
Twente (68%)
D
Feyenoord (73%)
W
Excelsior (69%)
D
Heerenveen (63%)
Groningen logo Groningen
D
Volos (32%)
L
Volendam (43%)
L
AEK Athens (58%)
L
Ajax (76%)
W
Heracles (41%)
W
NEC (73%)
L
Excelsior (64%)
L
Feyenoord (78%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Fayha H
7 - 0 W
30%
Go Ahead H
2 - 1 W
61%
Groningen A
1 - 2 L
58%
Telstar H
1 - 1 D
68%
Twente A
1 - 1 D
68%
Feyenoord H
1 - 1 D
73%
Excelsior A
2 - 0 W
69%
Heerenveen H
2 - 2 D
63%
PSV A
3 - 2 W
75%
Volendam H
3 - 0 W
57%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Volos H
0 - 0 D
32%
Volendam H
0 - 4 L
43%
AEK Athens H
1 - 2 L
58%
Ajax A
0 - 2 L
76%
Heracles A
2 - 1 W
41%
NEC H
2 - 1 W
73%
Excelsior H
2 - 3 L
64%
Feyenoord A
1 - 3 L
78%
Go Ahead H
0 - 0 D
61%
Telstar A
2 - 0 W
73%

AI Analysis

Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (64.9 vs 61.3), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Few sides can match NEC in front of goal. Their 2.3 average per fixture tells the story, with B. Linssen driving that output personally responsible for 4 goals this campaign.

NEC's backline outperforms Groningen's, with 1.0 goals conceded per match versus 1.6.

Groningen has proven their mettle against elite opponents, winning 2 of 4 matches against top-tier teams. This is a crucial indicator of their ability to perform under pressure.

Statistical modeling projects 3.0 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

📈 Form Momentum: NEC has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.9 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

💡 Why This Matters: The 30.5-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for NEC. In practical terms, NEC would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Our opponent-adjusted metrics point overwhelmingly in one direction: NEC holds a commanding advantage here. The power rating gap — 72.0 against 41.5 — reinforces what the underlying numbers already suggest, making NEC a strong and justified favorite to win decisively.

In their recent Dutch Eredivisie match (2026-05-10), Groningen prevailed 2-1 against NEC. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Groningen secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 2-1 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. NEC will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Groningen will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

NEC

NEC

VS
Groningen

Groningen

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

NEC

5W 4D 1L · 23 goals scored · 10 conceded

Groningen

3W 2D 5L · 10 goals scored · 16 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or