NEC vs Telstar Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare NEC vs Telstar: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
NEC
Home Team
Telstar
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
NEC
Draw
Telstar
Statistical Comparison
5W, 4D, 1L
6W, 1D, 3L
23 / 10 matches
21 / 10 matches
10 / 10 matches
14 / 10 matches
+13
+7
3 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
3W / 6 matches
4W / 5 matches
2W / 4 matches
2W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 76.5, Opponent Quality: 62.2
League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 58.3
1W / 2 matches
1W / 3 matches
Actual: 2.3 | Diff: -0.3
Actual: 2.1 | Diff: -0.27
Attack: 88.1, Defense: 76.6, Form: 57.5
Attack: 77.5, Defense: 59.0, Form: 66.4
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
NEC
Telstar
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 64.9 vs 60.7), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
The attacking output of NEC and Telstar is virtually identical, with both sides posting averages of 2.3 and 2.1 goals per game respectively.
NEC's backline outperforms Telstar's, with 1.0 goals conceded per match versus 1.4.
Telstar has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Telstar has an exceptional home record with a 80% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.4 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.
📈 Form Momentum: NEC has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.9 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
📈 Form Momentum: Telstar has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.9 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
💡 Why This Matters: The 7.6-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 69% win probability for NEC. In practical terms, NEC would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.
The numbers lean toward NEC, with a 7.6-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.
These two teams drew 1-1 in the Dutch Eredivisie (2026-05-02). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
NEC
Telstar
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
NEC
5W 4D 1L · 23 goals scored · 10 conceded
Telstar
6W 1D 3L · 21 goals scored · 14 conceded
Popular Teams