Skip to content
Compare Forest vs Fulham

Forest vs Fulham Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Forest vs Fulham: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Forest Forest Home Team
Fulham Fulham Away Team
Forest
73.3
W W D L D L W W W W

Last 10 Matches

Fulham
45.8
L W D L L W D L W D

Performance Radar

Forest
Fulham

Categories Won

11

Forest

2

Draw

2

Fulham

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
60%

6W, 2D, 2L

30%

3W, 3D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
2.2

22 / 10 matches

0.7

7 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+11

+11

-3

-3

Clean Sheet
40%

4 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Gibbs-White (6 goals)
T. Cairney (1 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 15
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 4
Home Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
67%

4W / 6 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
67.3

League Difficulty: 84.8, Opponent Quality: 66.9

65.7

League Difficulty: 92.7, Opponent Quality: 69.5

Elite Opponent Record
40%

2W / 5 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.52

Actual: 2.2 | Diff: -0.32

0.8

Actual: 0.7 | Diff: -0.1

Adjusted Power Rating
73.3

Attack: 86.0, Defense: 74.3, Form: 70.4

45.8

Attack: 27.0, Defense: 77.1, Form: 34.7

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

1

16-30'

1
4

31-45'

1
2

46-60'

1
3

61-75'

2
5

76-90+'

2
Forest
Fulham
Forest

Power Rating Breakdown

73.3

Overall

Attack 86.0
Defense 74.3
Form 70.4
Consistency 52.0
Fulham

Power Rating Breakdown

45.8

Overall

Attack 27.0
Defense 77.1
Form 34.7
Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

84.8 vs 92.7

Opponent Quality

66.9 vs 69.5

Elite Opponent Record

40% vs 17%
Forest logo Forest
W
Blackburn (50%)
W
Notts Co (50%)
D
Bournemouth (80%)
L
Man Utd (84%)
D
Newcastle (64%)
L
Villa (78%)
W
Chelsea (66%)
W
Villa (73%)
Fulham logo Fulham
L
Norwich (54%)
W
Newcastle (64%)
D
Wolves (60%)
L
Bournemouth (80%)
L
Arsenal (84%)
W
Villa (79%)
D
Brentford (70%)
L
Liverpool (72%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Blackburn A
3 - 0 W
50%
Notts Co A
2 - 0 W
50%
Bournemouth H
1 - 1 D
80%
Man Utd A
2 - 3 L
84%
Newcastle H
1 - 1 D
64%
Villa A
0 - 4 L
78%
Chelsea A
3 - 1 W
66%
Villa H
1 - 0 W
73%
Sunderland A
5 - 0 W
76%
Burnley H
4 - 1 W
48%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Norwich H
0 - 2 L
54%
Newcastle H
2 - 0 W
64%
Wolves A
1 - 1 D
60%
Bournemouth H
0 - 1 L
80%
Arsenal A
0 - 3 L
84%
Villa H
1 - 0 W
79%
Brentford A
0 - 0 D
70%
Liverpool A
0 - 2 L
72%
Burnley H
3 - 1 W
48%
Forest A
0 - 0 D
84%

AI Analysis

Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 67.3 vs 65.7), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Forest's attack is on another level, averaging 2.2 goals per match with M. Gibbs-White leading the charge (6 goals). This firepower makes them dangerous in any fixture.

Defensively, Forest and Fulham are evenly matched, allowing 1.1 and 1.0 goals per game respectively.

Forest has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 2 of 5 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Fulham has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 6 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Forest is a strong road performer with a 67% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Statistical modeling projects 2.5 goals in this fixture. The data points Under 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at unlikely based on both sides' scoring records.

📈 Form Momentum: Forest has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 2.0 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Forest is on the rise with 6W in last 10, while Fulham shows signs of decline with 3W in last 10.

💡 Why This Matters: The 27.5-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Forest. In practical terms, Forest would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers point firmly toward Forest in this contest. Their superior power rating of 73.3, compared to 45.8 for the opposition, reflects a meaningful edge across the metrics that matter most when projecting an outcome.

These two teams drew 0-0 in the Premier League (2026-03-15). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Forest

Forest

VS
Fulham

Fulham

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Forest

6W 2D 2L · 22 goals scored · 11 conceded

Fulham

3W 3D 4L · 7 goals scored · 10 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or