Skip to content
Compare Paide vs Zira

Paide vs Zira Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Paide vs Zira: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Paide Paide Home Team
Zira Zira Away Team
Paide
50.2
L L D W W D

Last 10 Matches

Zira
75.4
D L W W

Performance Radar

Paide
Zira

Categories Won

2

Paide

1

Draw

12

Zira

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
33%

2W, 2D, 2L

50%

2W, 1D, 1L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

7 / 6 matches

1.8

7 / 4 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.3

8 / 6 matches

0.5

2 / 4 matches

Goal Difference
-1

-1

+5

+5

Clean Sheet
33%

2 / 6 matches

50%

2 / 4 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
33%

2 / 6 matches

50%

2 / 4 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

3 / 6 matches

25%

1 / 4 matches

Top Scorer
A. Badamosi (2 goals)
E. Aydın (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 3
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 3
Home Win Rate
67%

2W / 3 matches

50%

1W / 2 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 3 matches

50%

1W / 2 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
66.9

League Difficulty: 78.0, Opponent Quality: 78.3

80.2

League Difficulty: 78.0, Opponent Quality: 68.5

Elite Opponent Record
33%

2W / 6 matches

100%

1W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.41

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.24

1.91

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.16

Adjusted Power Rating
50.2

Attack: 46.8, Defense: 66.2, Form: 38.6

75.4

Attack: 78.1, Defense: 100, Form: 65.1

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

1
3

31-45'

2

46-60'

1
2

61-75'

2
1

76-90+'

Paide
Zira
Paide

Power Rating Breakdown

50.2

Overall

Attack 46.8
Defense 66.2
Form 38.6
Consistency 53.3
Zira

Power Rating Breakdown

75.4

Overall

Attack 78.1
Defense 100
Form 65.1
Consistency 49.4

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

78.0 vs 78.0

Opponent Quality

78.3 vs 68.5

Elite Opponent Record

33% vs 100%
Paide logo Paide
L
Rapid Vienna (90%)
L
Rapid Vienna (85%)
D
Zira (77%)
W
Zira (75%)
W
Hegelmann (71%)
D
Hegelmann (72%)
Zira logo Zira
D
Paide (66%)
L
Paide (69%)
W
Kutaisi (70%)
W
Kutaisi (69%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Rapid Vienna A
0 - 2 L
90%
Rapid Vienna H
1 - 4 L
85%
Zira A
1 - 1 D
77%
Zira H
1 - 0 W
75%
Hegelmann H
3 - 0 W
71%
Hegelmann A
1 - 1 D
72%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Paide H
1 - 1 D
66%
Paide A
0 - 1 L
69%
Kutaisi A
3 - 0 W
70%
Kutaisi H
3 - 0 W
69%

AI Analysis

Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.

Context matters here: Zira's schedule strength (SoS: 80.2) has been notably more demanding than Paide's (SoS: 66.9), meaning their underlying stats reflect performance against higher-calibre opposition and should be weighted accordingly.

Zira holds the attacking edge with 1.8 goals per match versus Paide's 1.2, though the gap isn't insurmountable.

Defensively, Zira is far superior, conceding just 0.5 goals per match with 2 clean sheets, while Paide leaks 1.3 goals per match.

Paide has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 2 of 6 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.4 total goals. Going Under 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking unlikely given current form.

❄️ Form Momentum: Paide is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 6 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

❄️ Form Momentum: Zira is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 4 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

💡 Why This Matters: The 25.2-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Zira. In practical terms, Zira would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Zira emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (75.4 vs 50.2) and advantages in key areas, they should have enough to prevail.

These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. These two teams drew 1-1 in the UEFA Conference League (2026-07-30). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning. In their recent UEFA Conference League encounter (2026-07-23), Paide came out on top with a 1-0 victory over Zira. European competition results carry significant weight in assessing the balance of power between these sides. Paide secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 1-0 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Zira will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Paide will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Paide

Paide

VS
Zira

Zira

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Paide

2W 2D 2L · 7 goals scored · 8 conceded

Zira

2W 1D 1L · 7 goals scored · 2 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or