Skip to content
Compare Palestine vs Kyrgyzstan

Palestine vs Kyrgyzstan Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Palestine vs Kyrgyzstan: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Palestine Palestine Home Team
Kyrgyzstan Kyrgyzstan Away Team
Palestine
44.9
D D L D W

Last 10 Matches

Kyrgyzstan
34.9
D D L L D D

Performance Radar

Palestine
Kyrgyzstan

Categories Won

6

Palestine

4

Draw

5

Kyrgyzstan

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

1W, 3D, 1L

0%

0W, 4D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
0.6

3 / 5 matches

0.8

5 / 6 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.4

2 / 5 matches

1.5

9 / 6 matches

Goal Difference
+1

+1

-4

-4

Clean Sheet
60%

3 / 5 matches

33%

2 / 6 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
0%

0 / 5 matches

33%

2 / 6 matches

Both Teams to Score
20%

1 / 5 matches

50%

3 / 6 matches

Top Scorer
Wessam Abou Ali (1 goals)
Kim Sung-Hye (1 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 2
1st Half: 0 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
51.5

League Difficulty: 74.0, Opponent Quality: 62.6

52.0

League Difficulty: 75.0, Opponent Quality: 63.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.47

Actual: 0.6 | Diff: +0.13

0.89

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: -0.06

Adjusted Power Rating
44.9

Attack: 20.3, Defense: 88.0, Form: 20.3

34.9

Attack: 27.2, Defense: 51.0, Form: 0.0

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

1

31-45'

1

46-60'

1

61-75'

1

76-90+'

2
Palestine
Kyrgyzstan
Palestine

Power Rating Breakdown

44.9

Overall

Attack 20.3
Defense 88.0
Form 20.3
Consistency 71.2
Kyrgyzstan

Power Rating Breakdown

34.9

Overall

Attack 27.2
Defense 51.0
Form 0.0
Consistency 93.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

74.0 vs 75.0

Opponent Quality

62.6 vs 63.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Palestine logo Palestine
D
Kyrgyzstan (66%)
D
Kyrgyzstan (66%)
L
Malaysia (77%)
D
Oman (50%)
W
Kuwait (54%)
Kyrgyzstan logo Kyrgyzstan
D
Palestine (70%)
D
Palestine (70%)
L
Madagascar (66%)
L
Equat Guinea (52%)
D
UAE (59%)
D
Korea DPR (61%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Kyrgyzstan A
0 - 0 D
66%
Kyrgyzstan A
0 - 0 D
66%
Malaysia A
0 - 1 L
77%
Oman H
1 - 1 D
50%
Kuwait A
2 - 0 W
54%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Palestine H
0 - 0 D
70%
Palestine H
0 - 0 D
70%
Madagascar H
2 - 5 L
66%
Equat Guinea H
0 - 1 L
52%
UAE H
1 - 1 D
59%
Korea DPR A
2 - 2 D
61%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 51.5 vs 52.0), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Palestine averaging 0.6 and Kyrgyzstan averaging 0.8 goals per match.

Defensively, Palestine is far superior, conceding just 0.4 goals per match with 3 clean sheets, while Kyrgyzstan leaks 1.5 goals per match.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 1.6 total goals. Going Under 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking unlikely given current form.

❄️ Form Momentum: Palestine is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 5 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

❄️ Form Momentum: Kyrgyzstan is struggling for form, winning just 0 of their last 6 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

💡 Why This Matters: The 10.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 75% win probability for Palestine. In practical terms, Palestine would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

While Palestine holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 10.0-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.

These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. These two teams drew 0-0 in the Internationals (2026-06-09). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning. These two teams drew 0-0 in the Internationals (2026-06-06). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Palestine

Palestine

VS
Kyrgyzstan

Kyrgyzstan

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Palestine

1W 3D 1L · 3 goals scored · 2 conceded

Kyrgyzstan

0W 4D 2L · 5 goals scored · 9 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or