Pisa vs Como Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Pisa vs Como: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Pisa
Home Team
Como
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Pisa
Draw
Como
Statistical Comparison
1W, 1D, 8L
5W, 2D, 3L
10 / 10 matches
19 / 10 matches
19 / 10 matches
10 / 10 matches
-9
+9
0 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
1W / 6 matches
2W / 4 matches
0W / 4 matches
3W / 6 matches
League Difficulty: 81.0, Opponent Quality: 62.6
League Difficulty: 85.5, Opponent Quality: 67.8
0W / 2 matches
0W / 4 matches
Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.18
Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.35
Attack: 34.8, Defense: 38.2, Form: 10.4
Attack: 68.3, Defense: 71.9, Form: 53.9
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Pisa
Como
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule adjustment reveals a significant quality gap. The favorite has been tested against tougher opposition and has consistently delivered.
Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 54.3 vs 57.9), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.
Como holds the attacking edge with 1.9 goals per match versus Pisa's 1.0, though the gap isn't insurmountable.
The numbers tell a compelling defensive story for Como — 1.0 goals conceded per game and 6 clean sheets put them well ahead of Pisa, who give up 1.9 goals per match at the other end.
Como has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.9 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking possible given current form.
❄️ Form Momentum: Pisa is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📈 Form Momentum: Como has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.7 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Como is on the rise with 5W in last 10, while Pisa shows signs of decline with 1W in last 10.
💡 Why This Matters: The 27.2-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Como. In practical terms, Como would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Based on the available data, Como holds the stronger position heading into this matchup. A power rating of 61.5 against 34.3 underlines their overall quality advantage and makes them the logical pick to come out on top.
In the Italian Serie A (2026-03-22), Como beat Pisa 5-0. League results are the most consistent indicator of form, and this result speaks volumes about the current dynamic between these teams. Como secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 5-0 scoreline was emphatic — Como completely dominated Pisa in that encounter, raising serious questions about Pisa's ability to compete at this level. Pisa will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Como will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Pisa
Como
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Pisa
1W 1D 8L · 10 goals scored · 19 conceded
Como
5W 2D 3L · 19 goals scored · 10 conceded
Popular Teams