Portadown vs Glenavon Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Portadown vs Glenavon: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Portadown
Home Team
Glenavon
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Portadown
Draw
Glenavon
Statistical Comparison
4W, 1D, 5L
1W, 4D, 5L
14 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
16 / 10 matches
17 / 10 matches
-2
-9
2 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
0W / 2 matches
0W / 6 matches
4W / 8 matches
1W / 4 matches
League Difficulty: 42.9, Opponent Quality: 53.4
League Difficulty: 42.9, Opponent Quality: 50.9
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.4 | Diff: +0.06
Actual: 0.8 | Diff: +0.1
Attack: 46.3, Defense: 46.3, Form: 39.7
Attack: 26.1, Defense: 42.3, Form: 9.8
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Portadown
Glenavon
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 49.2 vs 47.7), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
Portadown holds the attacking edge with 1.4 goals per match versus Glenavon's 0.8, though the gap isn't insurmountable.
Both defenses are comparable, with Portadown conceding 1.6 and Glenavon conceding 1.7 per match.
Portadown has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Glenavon has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being possible.
❄️ Form Momentum: Glenavon is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Portadown is on the rise with 4W in last 10, while Glenavon shows signs of decline with 1W in last 10.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Portadown faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.6 goals per match. If Glenavon can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 10.6-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 76% win probability for Portadown. In practical terms, Portadown would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Portadown has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 10.6-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.
These two teams drew 1-1 in the Irish Premiership (2026-04-04). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Portadown
Glenavon
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Portadown
4W 1D 5L · 14 goals scored · 16 conceded
Glenavon
1W 4D 5L · 8 goals scored · 17 conceded
Popular Teams