Skip to content
Compare Randers vs Copenhagen

Randers vs Copenhagen Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Randers vs Copenhagen: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Randers Randers Home Team
Copenhagen Copenhagen Away Team
Randers
34.1
D D W L D W L D L L

Last 10 Matches

Copenhagen
74.3
W D W W W W D W W W

Performance Radar

Randers
Copenhagen

Categories Won

0

Randers

3

Draw

12

Copenhagen

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 4D, 4L

80%

8W, 2D, 0L

Goals Scored / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

3.2

32 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.0

20 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-7

-7

+20

+20

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

100%

10 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
C. Edudzi (2 goals)
J. Larsson (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 11
1st Half: 13 / 2nd Half: 19
Home Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

100%

5W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
39.6

League Difficulty: 53.0, Opponent Quality: 52.7

40.1

League Difficulty: 56.3, Opponent Quality: 50.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.21

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.09

3.24

Actual: 3.2 | Diff: -0.04

Adjusted Power Rating
34.1

Attack: 38.8, Defense: 29.9, Form: 17.9

74.3

Attack: 90.1, Defense: 54.1, Form: 72.1

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

6
1

16-30'

2

31-45'

5
3

46-60'

3
3

61-75'

2

76-90+'

11
Randers
Copenhagen
Randers

Power Rating Breakdown

34.1

Overall

Attack 38.8
Defense 29.9
Form 17.9
Consistency 64.0
Copenhagen

Power Rating Breakdown

74.3

Overall

Attack 90.1
Defense 54.1
Form 72.1
Consistency 80.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

53.0 vs 56.3

Opponent Quality

52.7 vs 50.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Randers logo Randers
D
Silkeborg (50%)
D
Lechia (41%)
W
Notts Co (45%)
L
Copenhagen (79%)
D
OB (42%)
W
Vejle (44%)
L
Silkeborg (55%)
D
Fredericia (50%)
Copenhagen logo Copenhagen
W
Lyngby (52%)
D
Polissya (70%)
W
Viborg (42%)
W
Brøndby (51%)
W
Randers (43%)
W
Silkeborg (55%)
D
Fredericia (55%)
W
Vejle (44%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Silkeborg H
1 - 1 D
50%
Lechia A
2 - 2 D
41%
Notts Co H
3 - 1 W
45%
Copenhagen A
0 - 5 L
79%
OB H
2 - 2 D
42%
Vejle H
1 - 0 W
44%
Silkeborg A
0 - 2 L
55%
Fredericia H
2 - 2 D
50%
OB A
1 - 3 L
47%
Copenhagen H
1 - 2 L
74%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Lyngby H
3 - 2 W
52%
Polissya A
3 - 3 D
70%
Viborg H
2 - 1 W
42%
Brøndby A
3 - 1 W
51%
Randers H
5 - 0 W
43%
Silkeborg A
4 - 0 W
55%
Fredericia A
3 - 3 D
55%
Vejle H
3 - 0 W
44%
OB H
2 - 1 W
42%
Vejle A
4 - 1 W
49%

AI Analysis

Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 39.6 vs 40.1), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Copenhagen possess a formidable attacking unit, with J. Larsson accounting for 5 goals and the squad maintaining an impressive 3.2 goals per game — a threat no opponent can afford to overlook.

Copenhagen holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 1.2 goals per game and recording 3 clean sheets, compared to Randers's leaky backline that surrenders 2.0 goals per match.

Copenhagen has an exceptional home record with a 100% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.

Copenhagen is a strong road performer with a 60% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

❄️ Form Momentum: Randers is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

🔥 Form Momentum: Copenhagen is in scorching form, winning 8 of their last 10 matches with 32 goals scored. This level of consistency is difficult to sustain but devastating while it lasts.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Copenhagen is on the rise with 8W in last 10, while Randers shows signs of decline with 2W in last 10.

💡 Why This Matters: The 40.2-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Copenhagen. In practical terms, Copenhagen would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Our opponent-adjusted metrics point overwhelmingly in one direction: Copenhagen holds a commanding advantage here. The power rating gap — 74.3 against 34.1 — reinforces what the underlying numbers already suggest, making Copenhagen a strong and justified favorite to win decisively.

These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. In their recent Danish Superligaen match (2026-05-17), Copenhagen prevailed 5-0 against Randers. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Copenhagen secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 5-0 scoreline was emphatic — Copenhagen completely dominated Randers in that encounter, raising serious questions about Randers's ability to compete at this level. Randers will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Copenhagen will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost. In their recent Danish Superligaen match (2026-04-12), Copenhagen prevailed 1-2 against Randers. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, Copenhagen achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Randers shows genuine quality and mental strength. The narrow 1-2 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Randers will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Copenhagen will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Randers

Randers

VS
Copenhagen

Copenhagen

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Randers

2W 4D 4L · 13 goals scored · 20 conceded

Copenhagen

8W 2D 0L · 32 goals scored · 12 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or