Reading vs Plymouth Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Reading vs Plymouth: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Reading
Home Team
Plymouth
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Reading
Draw
Plymouth
Statistical Comparison
2W, 2D, 6L
7W, 2D, 1L
9 / 10 matches
20 / 10 matches
11 / 10 matches
9 / 10 matches
-2
+11
2 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
1W / 4 matches
1W / 3 matches
1W / 6 matches
6W / 7 matches
League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 53.2
League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 47.5
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 0.9 | Diff: +0.06
Actual: 2.0 | Diff: +0.16
Attack: 30.0, Defense: 63.3, Form: 20.0
Attack: 64.3, Defense: 67.6, Form: 67.6
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Reading
Plymouth
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule adjustment reveals a significant quality gap. The favorite has been tested against tougher opposition and has consistently delivered.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 49.9 vs 46.5), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
Plymouth possess a formidable attacking unit, with L. Tolaj accounting for 4 goals and the squad maintaining an impressive 2.0 goals per game — a threat no opponent can afford to overlook.
Defensively, Reading and Plymouth are evenly matched, allowing 1.1 and 0.9 goals per game respectively.
Reading has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Plymouth has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Plymouth is a strong road performer with a 86% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.
Statistical modeling projects 2.5 goals in this fixture. The data points Under 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at possible based on both sides' scoring records.
❄️ Form Momentum: Reading is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
🔥 Form Momentum: Plymouth is in scorching form, winning 7 of their last 10 matches with 20 goals scored. This level of consistency is difficult to sustain but devastating while it lasts.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Plymouth is on the rise with 7W in last 10, while Reading shows signs of decline with 2W in last 10.
💡 Why This Matters: The 26.3-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Plymouth. In practical terms, Plymouth would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Based on the available data, Plymouth holds the stronger position heading into this matchup. A power rating of 66.0 against 39.7 underlines their overall quality advantage and makes them the logical pick to come out on top.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
Reading
Plymouth
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Reading
2W 2D 6L · 9 goals scored · 11 conceded
Plymouth
7W 2D 1L · 20 goals scored · 9 conceded
Popular Teams