RFS vs Glentoran Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare RFS vs Glentoran: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Glentoran
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
RFS
Draw
Glentoran
Statistical Comparison
3W, 1D, 2L
4W, 2D, 4L
10 / 6 matches
16 / 10 matches
7 / 6 matches
14 / 10 matches
+3
+2
1 / 6 matches
4 / 10 matches
3 / 6 matches
5 / 10 matches
4 / 6 matches
5 / 10 matches
2W / 3 matches
2W / 5 matches
1W / 3 matches
2W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 78.0, Opponent Quality: 67.0
League Difficulty: 49.2, Opponent Quality: 56.4
0W / 2 matches
0W / 2 matches
Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.24
Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.1
Attack: 59.3, Defense: 62.8, Form: 52.4
Attack: 47.7, Defense: 47.7, Form: 35.8
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Glentoran
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.
Context matters here: RFS's schedule strength (SoS: 54.7) has been notably more demanding than Glentoran's (SoS: 39.4), meaning their underlying stats reflect performance against higher-calibre opposition and should be weighted accordingly.
The attacking output of RFS and Glentoran is virtually identical, with both sides posting averages of 1.7 and 1.6 goals per game respectively.
Both defenses are comparable, with RFS conceding 1.2 and Glentoran conceding 1.4 per match.
Statistical modeling projects 3.0 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, RFS faces a key vulnerability: they have kept only 1 clean sheets in their last 10 matches. If Glentoran can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 12.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 80% win probability for RFS. In practical terms, RFS would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
RFS has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 12.0-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.
These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. In their recent UEFA Conference League encounter (2026-07-16), RFS came out on top with a 2-0 victory over Glentoran. European competition results carry significant weight in assessing the balance of power between these sides. RFS secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. Glentoran will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. RFS will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost. In their recent UEFA Conference League encounter (2026-07-09), RFS came out on top with a 1-2 victory over Glentoran. European competition results carry significant weight in assessing the balance of power between these sides. Notably, RFS achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Glentoran shows genuine quality and mental strength. The narrow 1-2 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Glentoran will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. RFS will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
RFS
Glentoran
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
RFS
3W 1D 2L · 10 goals scored · 7 conceded
Glentoran
4W 2D 4L · 16 goals scored · 14 conceded
Popular Teams