Skip to content
Compare Richards Bay vs Arrows

Richards Bay vs Arrows Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Richards Bay vs Arrows: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Richards Bay Richards Bay Home Team
Arrows Arrows Away Team
Richards Bay
39.6
D D L L D D D D W D

Last 10 Matches

Arrows
47.0
D D D D W D D D W W

Performance Radar

Richards Bay
Arrows

Categories Won

5

Richards Bay

2

Draw

8

Arrows

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 7D, 2L

30%

3W, 7D, 0L

Goals Scored / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

0.6

6 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.9

9 / 10 matches

0.2

2 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-1

-1

+4

+4

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
20%

2 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
T. Monare (1 goals)
S. Dion (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 4
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 3
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
45.7

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 46.1

43.3

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 42.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.64

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: +0.16

0.48

Actual: 0.6 | Diff: +0.12

Adjusted Power Rating
39.6

Attack: 25.5, Defense: 67.0, Form: 9.6

47.0

Attack: 18.7, Defense: 87.1, Form: 28.0

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

1
3

46-60'

2
1

61-75'

1

76-90+'

1
Richards Bay
Arrows
Richards Bay

Power Rating Breakdown

39.6

Overall

Attack 25.5
Defense 67.0
Form 9.6
Consistency 82.0
Arrows

Power Rating Breakdown

47.0

Overall

Attack 18.7
Defense 87.1
Form 28.0
Consistency 74.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

46.1 vs 42.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Richards Bay logo Richards Bay
D
Durban City (41%)
D
Chippa Utd (43%)
L
Polokwane (40%)
L
Magesi (43%)
D
Sekhukhune Utd (52%)
D
Gallants (46%)
D
Polokwane (40%)
D
Sundowns (52%)
Arrows logo Arrows
D
Galaxy (46%)
D
Durban City (41%)
D
Chippa Utd (38%)
D
Galaxy (41%)
W
Chippa Utd (43%)
D
Polokwane (40%)
D
AmaZulu (56%)
D
Siwelele (43%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Durban City A
1 - 1 D
41%
Chippa Utd A
1 - 1 D
43%
Polokwane H
1 - 2 L
40%
Magesi A
0 - 1 L
43%
Sekhukhune Utd H
1 - 1 D
52%
Gallants A
1 - 1 D
46%
Polokwane H
0 - 0 D
40%
Sundowns H
0 - 0 D
52%
Galaxy A
1 - 0 W
46%
Pirates H
2 - 2 D
58%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Galaxy A
0 - 0 D
46%
Durban City A
0 - 0 D
41%
Chippa Utd H
0 - 0 D
38%
Galaxy H
0 - 0 D
41%
Chippa Utd A
2 - 0 W
43%
Polokwane H
0 - 0 D
40%
AmaZulu A
1 - 1 D
56%
Siwelele H
0 - 0 D
43%
Orbit A
2 - 1 W
38%
Durban City H
1 - 0 W
36%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (45.7 vs 43.3), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Richards Bay (0.8 goals per match) and Arrows (0.6 goals per match) present comparable offensive threats, making this an evenly contested attacking matchup.

Arrows has the defensive edge, conceding 0.2 per match compared to Richards Bay's 0.9.

Richards Bay has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Arrows has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 1.3 total goals. Going Under 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking possible given current form.

❄️ Form Momentum: Richards Bay is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

💡 Why This Matters: The 7.4-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 68% win probability for Arrows. In practical terms, Arrows would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

While Arrows holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 7.4-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Richards Bay

Richards Bay

VS
Arrows

Arrows

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Richards Bay

1W 7D 2L · 8 goals scored · 9 conceded

Arrows

3W 7D 0L · 6 goals scored · 2 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or