Riga vs Vardar Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Riga vs Vardar: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Riga
Draw
Vardar
Statistical Comparison
4W, 2D, 1L
1W, 0D, 3L
13 / 7 matches
7 / 4 matches
9 / 7 matches
12 / 4 matches
+4
-5
2 / 7 matches
0 / 4 matches
3 / 7 matches
3 / 4 matches
4 / 7 matches
3 / 4 matches
3W / 3 matches
0W / 2 matches
1W / 4 matches
1W / 2 matches
League Difficulty: 83.4, Opponent Quality: 69.3
League Difficulty: 87.5, Opponent Quality: 70.0
1W / 2 matches
0W / 2 matches
Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.34
Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.56
Attack: 76.1, Defense: 68.1, Form: 68.5
Attack: 65.7, Defense: 0.0, Form: 27.4
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.
Riga has earned their numbers the hard way, posting a SoS of 70.1 against considerably stronger competition than Vardar (SoS: 59.5). Their figures deserve greater analytical credence as a result — forged against genuinely difficult opponents.
Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Riga averaging 1.9 and Vardar averaging 1.8 goals per match.
Riga holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 1.3 goals per game and recording 2 clean sheets, compared to Vardar's leaky backline that surrenders 3.0 goals per match.
Riga has an exceptional home record with a 100% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 4.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.
📈 Form Momentum: Riga has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 2.0 points per game over their last 7 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
❄️ Form Momentum: Vardar is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 4 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Riga is on the rise with 4W in last 7, while Vardar shows signs of decline with 1W in last 4.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Riga faces a key vulnerability: their away form is significantly weaker than their home record. If Vardar can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 33.6-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Riga. In practical terms, Riga would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Accounting for opponent quality throughout our evaluation, Riga emerges as the heavy favorite by every measurable indicator. A power rating of 68.9 compared to 35.3, combined with across-the-board statistical superiority, projects Riga as the likely winner and by a comfortable margin.
These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. In their recent UEFA Conference League encounter (2026-07-28), Riga came out on top with a 5-2 victory over Vardar. European competition results carry significant weight in assessing the balance of power between these sides. Riga secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 5-2 scoreline was emphatic — Riga completely dominated Vardar in that encounter, raising serious questions about Vardar's ability to compete at this level. Vardar will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Riga will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost. In their recent UEFA Conference League encounter (2026-07-22), Riga came out on top with a 2-3 victory over Vardar. European competition results carry significant weight in assessing the balance of power between these sides. Notably, Riga achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Vardar shows genuine quality and mental strength. The narrow 2-3 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Vardar will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Riga will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Riga
Vardar
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Riga
4W 2D 1L · 13 goals scored · 9 conceded
Vardar
1W 0D 3L · 7 goals scored · 12 conceded
Popular Teams