Riga vs Vardar Estadísticas Cara a Cara y Comparación de Forma
Compará Riga vs Vardar: estadísticas mano a mano, forma reciente, goles, récord defensivo e indicadores de fuerza de los últimos partidos.
Comparar...
Radar de Rendimiento
Categorías Ganadas
Riga
Empate
Vardar
Comparación Estadística
4V, 2E, 1D
1V, 0E, 3D
13 / 7 partidos
7 / 4 partidos
9 / 7 partidos
12 / 4 partidos
+4
-5
2 / 7 partidos
0 / 4 partidos
3 / 7 partidos
3 / 4 partidos
4 / 7 partidos
3 / 4 partidos
3V / 3 partidos
0V / 2 partidos
1V / 4 partidos
1V / 2 partidos
Dificultad de Liga: 83.4, Calidad del Rival: 69.3
Dificultad de Liga: 87.5, Calidad del Rival: 70.0
1V / 2 partidos
0V / 2 partidos
Real: 1.9 | Dif: -0.34
Real: 1.8 | Dif: -0.56
Ataque: 76.1, Defensa: 68.1, Forma: 68.5
Ataque: 65.7, Defensa: 0.0, Forma: 27.4
Análisis de Tiempos de Gol
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Desglose de Poder
General
Desglose de Poder
General
Dificultad del Calendario
Mide la dificultad de los rivales enfrentados. Mayor = calendario más difícil.
Dificultad de Liga
Calidad del Rival
Récord contra Élite
Calidad del Rival: La calidad combina la fuerza de la liga, la forma reciente por puntos, la diferencia de goles y el contexto local/visitante. No es solo tamaño o reputación del club.
Análisis IA
Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.
Riga has earned their numbers the hard way, posting a SoS of 70.1 against considerably stronger competition than Vardar (SoS: 59.5). Their figures deserve greater analytical credence as a result — forged against genuinely difficult opponents.
Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Riga averaging 1.9 and Vardar averaging 1.8 goals per match.
Riga holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 1.3 goals per game and recording 2 clean sheets, compared to Vardar's leaky backline that surrenders 3.0 goals per match.
Riga has an exceptional home record with a 100% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 4.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.
📈 Form Momentum: Riga has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 2.0 points per game over their last 7 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
❄️ Form Momentum: Vardar is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 4 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Riga is on the rise with 4W in last 7, while Vardar shows signs of decline with 1W in last 4.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Riga faces a key vulnerability: their away form is significantly weaker than their home record. If Vardar can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 33.6-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Riga. In practical terms, Riga would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Accounting for opponent quality throughout our evaluation, Riga emerges as the heavy favorite by every measurable indicator. A power rating of 68.9 compared to 35.3, combined with across-the-board statistical superiority, projects Riga as the likely winner and by a comfortable margin.
These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. In their recent UEFA Conference League encounter (2026-07-28), Riga came out on top with a 5-2 victory over Vardar. European competition results carry significant weight in assessing the balance of power between these sides. Riga secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 5-2 scoreline was emphatic — Riga completely dominated Vardar in that encounter, raising serious questions about Vardar's ability to compete at this level. Vardar will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Riga will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost. In their recent UEFA Conference League encounter (2026-07-22), Riga came out on top with a 2-3 victory over Vardar. European competition results carry significant weight in assessing the balance of power between these sides. Notably, Riga achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Vardar shows genuine quality and mental strength. The narrow 2-3 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Vardar will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Riga will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Simulador de Partido
Simulación de partido con IA basada en estadísticas reales
Riga
Vardar
En los enfrentamientos H2H (cara a cara), para eliminar las fluctuaciones momentáneas y las casualidades, limitamos nuestros análisis a una profundidad óptima de exactamente 10 partidos. Ni más, ni menos. Este enfoque preciso es nuestro estándar de oro indiscutible, que revela en su forma más pura la superioridad táctica y psicológica que un equipo ejerce sobre otro. No nos dejamos llevar por el ruido del pasado, sino que nos enfocamos en la precisión milimétrica de la forma actual.
Resumen de enfrentamientos directos
Esta comparación cara a cara analiza los últimos 10 partidos de cada equipo, evaluando la potencia ofensiva, la solidez defensiva, la consistencia del rendimiento y las métricas generales de rendimiento. Las calificaciones de poder se calculan mediante un algoritmo ponderado que considera los goles a favor, los goles en contra, el porcentaje de victorias y las tendencias recientes de forma.
Riga
4W 2D 1L · 13 goles a favor · 9 goles en contra
Vardar
1W 0D 3L · 7 goles a favor · 12 goles en contra
Equipos Populares