Skip to content
Compare Rosenborg vs Brann

Rosenborg vs Brann Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Rosenborg vs Brann: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Rosenborg Rosenborg Home Team
Brann Brann Away Team
Rosenborg
46.6
W W L W L W W D L L

Last 10 Matches

Brann
63.3
D W W L W W L D W W

Performance Radar

Rosenborg
Brann

Categories Won

2

Rosenborg

3

Draw

10

Brann

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 1D, 4L

60%

6W, 2D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
2.0

20 / 10 matches

2.2

22 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+4

+4

+8

+8

Clean Sheet
40%

4 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
A. Chiakha (8 goals)
N. Castro (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 11
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 14
Home Win Rate
50%

3W / 6 matches

67%

4W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
37.4

League Difficulty: 49.5, Opponent Quality: 50.2

54.0

League Difficulty: 64.0, Opponent Quality: 57.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

33%

1W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.98

Actual: 2.0 | Diff: +0.02

2.45

Actual: 2.2 | Diff: -0.25

Adjusted Power Rating
46.6

Attack: 58.3, Defense: 40.8, Form: 43.7

63.3

Attack: 76.3, Defense: 55.5, Form: 62.4

Goal Timing Analysis

4

0-15'

3
1

16-30'

1
4

31-45'

3
1

46-60'

3
3

61-75'

5
7

76-90+'

7
Rosenborg
Brann
Rosenborg

Power Rating Breakdown

46.6

Overall

Attack 58.3
Defense 40.8
Form 43.7
Consistency 38.8
Brann

Power Rating Breakdown

63.3

Overall

Attack 76.3
Defense 55.5
Form 62.4
Consistency 52.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

49.5 vs 64.0

Opponent Quality

50.2 vs 57.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 33%
Rosenborg logo Rosenborg
W
Viking (59%)
W
Lillestrøm (47%)
L
Brann (64%)
W
Fredrikstad (48%)
L
Man Utd (50%)
W
Start (38%)
W
Kristiansund (35%)
D
Bodø/Glimt (70%)
Brann logo Brann
D
PAOK (64%)
W
HamKam (40%)
W
Apollon (77%)
L
Apollon (75%)
W
Rosenborg (51%)
W
U Cluj (68%)
L
Vålerenga (45%)
D
U Cluj (70%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Viking H
2 - 1 W
59%
Lillestrøm A
2 - 0 W
47%
Brann A
2 - 3 L
64%
Fredrikstad H
4 - 0 W
48%
Man Utd H
0 - 5 L
50%
Start A
3 - 0 W
38%
Kristiansund H
3 - 0 W
35%
Bodø/Glimt H
2 - 2 D
70%
KFUM A
0 - 2 L
47%
Aalesund H
2 - 3 L
44%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
PAOK A
1 - 1 D
64%
HamKam H
3 - 0 W
40%
Apollon A
4 - 2 W
77%
Apollon H
0 - 1 L
75%
Rosenborg H
3 - 2 W
51%
U Cluj H
3 - 1 W
68%
Vålerenga H
2 - 3 L
45%
U Cluj A
2 - 2 D
70%
Molde A
2 - 1 W
53%
Start H
2 - 1 W
33%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule adjustment reveals a significant quality gap. The favorite has been tested against tougher opposition and has consistently delivered.

Brann has earned their numbers the hard way, posting a SoS of 54.0 against considerably stronger competition than Rosenborg (SoS: 37.4). Their figures deserve greater analytical credence as a result — forged against genuinely difficult opponents.

The attacking output of Rosenborg and Brann is virtually identical, with both sides posting averages of 2.0 and 2.2 goals per game respectively.

Both defenses are comparable, with Rosenborg conceding 1.6 and Brann conceding 1.4 per match.

Brann has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Statistical modeling projects 3.6 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

📈 Form Momentum: Rosenborg has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📈 Form Momentum: Brann has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 2.0 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Brann faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If Rosenborg can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 16.7-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Brann. In practical terms, Brann would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Brann emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (63.3 vs 46.6) and advantages in key areas, they should have enough to prevail.

In their recent Norwegian Eliteserien match (2026-08-02), Brann prevailed 3-2 against Rosenborg. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Brann secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 3-2 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Rosenborg will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Brann will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Rosenborg

Rosenborg

VS
Brann

Brann

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Rosenborg

5W 1D 4L · 20 goals scored · 16 conceded

Brann

6W 2D 2L · 22 goals scored · 14 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or