Seraing vs Metz Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Seraing vs Metz: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Metz
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Seraing
Draw
Metz
Statistical Comparison
0W, 1D, 4L
3W, 3D, 4L
2 / 5 matches
20 / 10 matches
12 / 5 matches
18 / 10 matches
-10
+2
1 / 5 matches
3 / 10 matches
3 / 5 matches
8 / 10 matches
2 / 5 matches
6 / 10 matches
0W / 1 matches
3W / 7 matches
0W / 4 matches
0W / 3 matches
League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 49.4
League Difficulty: 73.7, Opponent Quality: 56.9
0W / 0 matches
0W / 2 matches
Actual: 0.4 | Diff: -0.08
Actual: 2.0 | Diff: -0.15
Attack: 13.0, Defense: 19.5, Form: 0.0
Attack: 66.3, Defense: 39.8, Form: 29.8
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Metz
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule adjustment reveals a significant quality gap. The favorite has been tested against tougher opposition and has consistently delivered.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 47.6 vs 49.4), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
Metz's attack is on another level, averaging 2.0 goals per match with G. Kvilitaia leading the charge (2 goals). This firepower makes them dangerous in any fixture.
Defensively, Metz holds the advantage — allowing just 1.8 goals per game against Seraing's 2.4.
Seraing has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.3 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking possible given current form.
❄️ Form Momentum: Seraing is struggling for form, winning just 0 of their last 5 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Metz is on the rise with 3W in last 10, while Seraing shows signs of decline with 0W in last 5.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Metz faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.8 goals per match. If Seraing can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 23.6-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Metz. In practical terms, Metz would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
The numbers point firmly toward Metz in this contest. Their superior power rating of 46.7, compared to 23.1 for the opposition, reflects a meaningful edge across the metrics that matter most when projecting an outcome.
In their recent Club Friendlies match (2026-07-17), Metz prevailed 6-0 against Seraing. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Metz secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 6-0 scoreline was emphatic — Metz completely dominated Seraing in that encounter, raising serious questions about Seraing's ability to compete at this level. Seraing will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Metz will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Seraing
Metz
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Seraing
0W 1D 4L · 2 goals scored · 12 conceded
Metz
3W 3D 4L · 20 goals scored · 18 conceded
Popular Teams