Skip to content
Compare Seraing vs Metz

Seraing vs Metz Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Seraing vs Metz: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Seraing Seraing Home Team
Metz Metz Away Team
Seraing
23.1
L L L L D

Last 10 Matches

Metz
46.7
W W W D L L D L L D

Performance Radar

Seraing
Metz

Categories Won

0

Seraing

3

Draw

12

Metz

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
0%

0W, 1D, 4L

30%

3W, 3D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
0.4

2 / 5 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.4

12 / 5 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-10

-10

+2

+2

Clean Sheet
20%

1 / 5 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

3 / 5 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

2 / 5 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
N/A (0 goals)
G. Kvilitaia (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 0 / 2nd Half: 2
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 17
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 1 matches

43%

3W / 7 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 3 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
47.6

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 49.4

49.4

League Difficulty: 73.7, Opponent Quality: 56.9

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.48

Actual: 0.4 | Diff: -0.08

2.15

Actual: 2.0 | Diff: -0.15

Adjusted Power Rating
23.1

Attack: 13.0, Defense: 19.5, Form: 0.0

46.7

Attack: 66.3, Defense: 39.8, Form: 29.8

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

1

16-30'

31-45'

1

46-60'

4

61-75'

76-90+'

1
Seraing
Metz
Seraing

Power Rating Breakdown

23.1

Overall

Attack 13.0
Defense 19.5
Form 0.0
Consistency 95.2
Metz

Power Rating Breakdown

46.7

Overall

Attack 66.3
Defense 39.8
Form 29.8
Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 73.7

Opponent Quality

49.4 vs 56.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Seraing logo Seraing
L
Standard (52%)
L
Charleroi (58%)
L
Feignies (44%)
L
Metz (50%)
D
MVV (43%)
Metz logo Metz
W
Fortuna (32%)
W
Sochaux (47%)
W
Seraing (33%)
D
Nice (75%)
L
Lorient (63%)
L
Monaco (62%)
D
Le Havre (66%)
L
Paris FC (74%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Standard A
1 - 2 L
52%
Charleroi A
1 - 2 L
58%
Feignies A
0 - 2 L
44%
Metz A
0 - 6 L
50%
MVV H
0 - 0 D
43%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Fortuna H
3 - 1 W
32%
Sochaux H
4 - 1 W
47%
Seraing H
6 - 0 W
33%
Nice A
0 - 0 D
75%
Lorient H
0 - 4 L
63%
Monaco H
1 - 2 L
62%
Le Havre A
4 - 4 D
66%
Paris FC H
1 - 3 L
74%
Marseille A
1 - 3 L
64%
Nantes H
0 - 0 D
53%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule adjustment reveals a significant quality gap. The favorite has been tested against tougher opposition and has consistently delivered.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 47.6 vs 49.4), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Metz's attack is on another level, averaging 2.0 goals per match with G. Kvilitaia leading the charge (2 goals). This firepower makes them dangerous in any fixture.

Defensively, Metz holds the advantage — allowing just 1.8 goals per game against Seraing's 2.4.

Seraing has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.3 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking possible given current form.

❄️ Form Momentum: Seraing is struggling for form, winning just 0 of their last 5 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Metz is on the rise with 3W in last 10, while Seraing shows signs of decline with 0W in last 5.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Metz faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.8 goals per match. If Seraing can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 23.6-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Metz. In practical terms, Metz would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers point firmly toward Metz in this contest. Their superior power rating of 46.7, compared to 23.1 for the opposition, reflects a meaningful edge across the metrics that matter most when projecting an outcome.

In their recent Club Friendlies match (2026-07-17), Metz prevailed 6-0 against Seraing. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Metz secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 6-0 scoreline was emphatic — Metz completely dominated Seraing in that encounter, raising serious questions about Seraing's ability to compete at this level. Seraing will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Metz will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Seraing

Seraing

VS
Metz

Metz

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Seraing

0W 1D 4L · 2 goals scored · 12 conceded

Metz

3W 3D 4L · 20 goals scored · 18 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or