Skip to content
Compare Seraing vs MVV

Seraing vs MVV Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Seraing vs MVV: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Seraing Seraing Home Team
MVV MVV Away Team
Seraing
23.1
L L L L D

Last 10 Matches

MVV
37.8
L D D

Performance Radar

Seraing
MVV

Categories Won

1

Seraing

6

Draw

8

MVV

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
0%

0W, 1D, 4L

0%

0W, 2D, 1L

Goals Scored / Match
0.4

2 / 5 matches

1.7

5 / 3 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.4

12 / 5 matches

2.0

6 / 3 matches

Goal Difference
-10

-10

-1

-1

Clean Sheet
20%

1 / 5 matches

33%

1 / 3 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

3 / 5 matches

67%

2 / 3 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

2 / 5 matches

67%

2 / 3 matches

Top Scorer
N/A (0 goals)
N/A (0 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 0 / 2nd Half: 2
1st Half: 0 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
47.6

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 49.4

43.8

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 43.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.48

Actual: 0.4 | Diff: -0.08

1.78

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.11

Adjusted Power Rating
23.1

Attack: 13.0, Defense: 19.5, Form: 0.0

37.8

Attack: 53.2, Defense: 31.3, Form: 0.0

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

16-30'

31-45'

46-60'

61-75'

76-90+'

Seraing
MVV
Seraing

Power Rating Breakdown

23.1

Overall

Attack 13.0
Defense 19.5
Form 0.0
Consistency 95.2
MVV

Power Rating Breakdown

37.8

Overall

Attack 53.2
Defense 31.3
Form 0.0
Consistency 93.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

49.4 vs 43.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Seraing logo Seraing
L
Standard (52%)
L
Charleroi (58%)
L
Feignies (44%)
L
Metz (50%)
D
MVV (43%)
MVV logo MVV
L
Beveren (47%)
D
EVV (46%)
D
Seraing (36%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Standard A
1 - 2 L
52%
Charleroi A
1 - 2 L
58%
Feignies A
0 - 2 L
44%
Metz A
0 - 6 L
50%
MVV H
0 - 0 D
43%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Beveren H
3 - 4 L
47%
EVV A
2 - 2 D
46%
Seraing A
0 - 0 D
36%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 47.6 vs 43.8), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

MVV possess a formidable attacking unit, with N/A accounting for 0 goals and the squad maintaining an impressive 1.7 goals per game — a threat no opponent can afford to overlook.

MVV's backline outperforms Seraing's, with 2.0 goals conceded per match versus 2.4.

Seraing has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

MVV has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.2 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being possible.

❄️ Form Momentum: Seraing is struggling for form, winning just 0 of their last 5 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

❄️ Form Momentum: MVV is struggling for form, winning just 0 of their last 3 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, MVV faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 2.0 goals per match. If Seraing can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 14.7-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for MVV. In practical terms, MVV would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

While MVV holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 14.7-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.

These two teams drew 0-0 in the Friendly (2026-07-14). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Seraing

Seraing

VS
MVV

MVV

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Seraing

0W 1D 4L · 2 goals scored · 12 conceded

MVV

0W 2D 1L · 5 goals scored · 6 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or