Skip to content
Compare Peng City vs Jinmen Tiger

Peng City vs Jinmen Tiger Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Peng City vs Jinmen Tiger: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Peng City Peng City Home Team
Jinmen Tiger Jinmen Tiger Away Team
Peng City
39.5
L L W L L W W D L L

Last 10 Matches

Jinmen Tiger
50.0
W W W L W D L L D D

Performance Radar

Peng City
Jinmen Tiger

Categories Won

5

Peng City

3

Draw

7

Jinmen Tiger

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 1D, 6L

40%

4W, 3D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-4

-4

+5

+5

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
Wesley (4 goals)
Xadas (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
48.2

League Difficulty: 48.0, Opponent Quality: 48.4

47.9

League Difficulty: 48.0, Opponent Quality: 47.9

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.48

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: +0.02

1.26

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.04

Adjusted Power Rating
39.5

Attack: 49.1, Defense: 36.0, Form: 29.5

50.0

Attack: 42.4, Defense: 71.8, Form: 39.2

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

2
4

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

2
1

46-60'

1
2

61-75'

1
5

76-90+'

6
Peng City
Jinmen Tiger
Peng City

Power Rating Breakdown

39.5

Overall

Attack 49.1
Defense 36.0
Form 29.5
Consistency 46.0
Jinmen Tiger

Power Rating Breakdown

50.0

Overall

Attack 42.4
Defense 71.8
Form 39.2
Consistency 50.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

48.0 vs 48.0

Opponent Quality

48.4 vs 47.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Peng City logo Peng City
L
Yukun (54%)
L
Three Towns (50%)
W
West Coast (56%)
L
Jinmen Tiger (56%)
L
Rongcheng (52%)
W
Hainiu (34%)
W
Shenhua (44%)
D
Yingbo (39%)
Jinmen Tiger logo Jinmen Tiger
W
Hainiu (39%)
W
Shenhua (44%)
W
Peng City (40%)
L
Tonglianglong (47%)
W
Yingbo (39%)
D
Port (55%)
L
Henan (49%)
L
Rongcheng (52%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Yukun A
3 - 4 L
54%
Three Towns A
0 - 2 L
50%
West Coast H
3 - 0 W
56%
Jinmen Tiger A
0 - 3 L
56%
Rongcheng H
2 - 3 L
52%
Hainiu H
3 - 2 W
34%
Shenhua A
2 - 1 W
44%
Yingbo H
1 - 1 D
39%
Henan A
0 - 1 L
54%
Taishan H
1 - 2 L
45%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Hainiu A
2 - 0 W
39%
Shenhua A
2 - 0 W
44%
Peng City H
3 - 0 W
40%
Tonglianglong A
0 - 1 L
47%
Yingbo H
1 - 0 W
39%
Port A
1 - 1 D
55%
Henan H
1 - 2 L
49%
Rongcheng H
1 - 2 L
52%
Zhejiang A
1 - 1 D
53%
West Coast A
1 - 1 D
61%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (48.2 vs 47.9), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Peng City (1.5 goals per match) and Jinmen Tiger (1.3 goals per match) present comparable offensive threats, making this an evenly contested attacking matchup.

Defensively, Jinmen Tiger is far superior, conceding just 0.8 goals per match with 4 clean sheets, while Peng City leaks 1.9 goals per match.

Peng City has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Jinmen Tiger has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.8 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.

📈 Form Momentum: Jinmen Tiger has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

💡 Why This Matters: The 10.5-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 76% win probability for Jinmen Tiger. In practical terms, Jinmen Tiger would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

While Jinmen Tiger holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 10.5-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.

In their recent Chinese Super League match (2026-07-04), Jinmen Tiger prevailed 3-0 against Peng City. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Jinmen Tiger secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 3-0 scoreline was emphatic — Jinmen Tiger completely dominated Peng City in that encounter, raising serious questions about Peng City's ability to compete at this level. Peng City will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Jinmen Tiger will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Peng City

Peng City

VS
Jinmen Tiger

Jinmen Tiger

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Peng City

3W 1D 6L · 15 goals scored · 19 conceded

Jinmen Tiger

4W 3D 3L · 13 goals scored · 8 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or