Earthquakes vs Austin Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Earthquakes vs Austin: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Earthquakes
Home Team
Austin
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Earthquakes
Draw
Austin
Statistical Comparison
1W, 2D, 7L
2W, 2D, 6L
13 / 10 matches
10 / 10 matches
26 / 10 matches
21 / 10 matches
-13
-11
0 / 10 matches
0 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
0W / 6 matches
1W / 4 matches
1W / 4 matches
1W / 6 matches
League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 51.8
League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 51.8
0W / 0 matches
0W / 2 matches
Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.04
Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.05
Attack: 44.7, Defense: 13.7, Form: 10.3
Attack: 30.0, Defense: 27.0, Form: 18.0
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Earthquakes
Austin
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but when we adjust for opponent quality, the picture becomes even more intriguing. Both teams have earned their statistics against comparable opposition.
Earthquakes has earned their numbers the hard way, posting a SoS of 53.1 against considerably stronger competition than Austin (SoS: 40.1). Their figures deserve greater analytical credence as a result — forged against genuinely difficult opponents.
Earthquakes leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.3 goals per game compared to Austin's 1.0 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.
Defensively, Austin holds the advantage — allowing just 2.1 goals per game against Earthquakes's 2.6.
Earthquakes has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Statistical modeling projects 3.5 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.
❄️ Form Momentum: Earthquakes is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
❄️ Form Momentum: Austin is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.
💡 Why This Matters: Earthquakes's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.
This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by small margins on the day.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
Earthquakes
Austin
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Earthquakes
1W 2D 7L · 13 goals scored · 26 conceded
Austin
2W 2D 6L · 10 goals scored · 21 conceded
Popular Teams