Skip to content
Compare South Korea vs Iran

South Korea vs Iran Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare South Korea vs Iran: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

South Korea South Korea Home Team
Iran Iran Away Team
South Korea
42.1
D L L L W D W W L D

Last 10 Matches

Iran
35.4
L L L L L W W

Performance Radar

South Korea
Iran

Categories Won

10

South Korea

2

Draw

3

Iran

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 3D, 4L

29%

2W, 0D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
2.0

20 / 10 matches

0.7

5 / 7 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.2

22 / 10 matches

1.7

12 / 7 matches

Goal Difference
-2

-2

-7

-7

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

29%

2 / 7 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

43%

3 / 7 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 7 matches

Top Scorer
Park Soo-Jeong (3 goals)
N/A (0 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 12
1st Half: 0 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
45.6

League Difficulty: 62.5, Opponent Quality: 58.8

58.2

League Difficulty: 65.0, Opponent Quality: 53.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 3 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.95

Actual: 2.0 | Diff: +0.05

0.68

Actual: 0.7 | Diff: +0.03

Adjusted Power Rating
42.1

Attack: 63.7, Defense: 25.5, Form: 28.7

35.4

Attack: 25.2, Defense: 46.9, Form: 31.4

Goal Timing Analysis

4

0-15'

2

16-30'

1

31-45'

6

46-60'

3

61-75'

4

76-90+'

South Korea
Iran
South Korea

Power Rating Breakdown

42.1

Overall

Attack 63.7
Defense 25.5
Form 28.7
Consistency 53.2
Iran

Power Rating Breakdown

35.4

Overall

Attack 25.2
Defense 46.9
Form 31.4
Consistency 44.9

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

62.5 vs 65.0

Opponent Quality

58.8 vs 53.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
South Korea logo South Korea
D
Zambia (53%)
L
Canada (67%)
L
Brazil (75%)
L
Japan (62%)
W
Uzbekistan (39%)
D
Australia (66%)
W
Philippines (41%)
W
Iran (37%)
Iran logo Iran
L
Philippines (38%)
L
Australia (61%)
L
South Korea (48%)
L
Uzbekistan (58%)
L
Uzbekistan (58%)
W
Nepal (64%)
W
India (49%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Zambia H
1 - 1 D
53%
Canada A
1 - 3 L
67%
Brazil A
1 - 5 L
75%
Japan H
1 - 4 L
62%
Uzbekistan H
6 - 0 W
39%
Australia A
3 - 3 D
66%
Philippines A
3 - 0 W
41%
Iran H
3 - 0 W
37%
Netherlands A
0 - 5 L
78%
Wales H
1 - 1 D
70%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Philippines H
0 - 2 L
38%
Australia H
0 - 4 L
61%
South Korea A
0 - 3 L
48%
Uzbekistan A
0 - 1 L
58%
Uzbekistan A
0 - 2 L
58%
Nepal A
3 - 0 W
64%
India A
2 - 0 W
49%

AI Analysis

While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.

Iran has earned their numbers the hard way, posting a SoS of 58.2 against considerably stronger competition than South Korea (SoS: 45.6). Their figures deserve greater analytical credence as a result — forged against genuinely difficult opponents.

South Korea possess a formidable attacking unit, with Park Soo-Jeong accounting for 3 goals and the squad maintaining an impressive 2.0 goals per game — a threat no opponent can afford to overlook.

Iran's backline outperforms South Korea's, with 1.7 goals conceded per match versus 2.2.

South Korea has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Iran has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.3 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking unlikely given current form.

❄️ Form Momentum: Iran is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 7 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, South Korea faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 2.2 goals per match. If Iran can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 6.7-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 67% win probability for South Korea. In practical terms, South Korea would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

South Korea has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 6.7-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

In the AFC Women's Asian Cup (2026-03-02), South Korea eliminated Iran with a 3-0 result. Cup matches bring a unique intensity, and South Korea showed they can handle the pressure. South Korea secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 3-0 scoreline was emphatic — South Korea completely dominated Iran in that encounter, raising serious questions about Iran's ability to compete at this level. Iran will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. South Korea will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

South Korea

South Korea

VS
Iran

Iran

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

South Korea

3W 3D 4L · 20 goals scored · 22 conceded

Iran

2W 0D 5L · 5 goals scored · 12 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or